clawsie:
> i have written a small haskell program to solve a problem many users
> of freebsd may have - knowing what ports have been updated after a
> daily/weekly etc cvsup. this is a trivial bit of coding hardly worth
> attention, but if it might be of use to you, you can find it here:
>
> http:
Thomas, Stefan,
Thanks for a most edifying exchange! i will reflect on this.
Best wishes,
--greg
On 6/28/07, Stefan Holdermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas,
> let x = ... in ...
>
> is only equal
>
> do x <- ...; ...
>
> in the Identity monad. Also, why would "do" be more primitiv
Thomas,
let x = ... in ...
is only equal
do x <- ...; ...
in the Identity monad. Also, why would "do" be more primitive than
"let". That way you would have to use monads everywhere. Also,
let is treated specially by the type checker (IIRC) and there are
many, many other reasons n
i have written a small haskell program to solve a problem many users
of freebsd may have - knowing what ports have been updated after a
daily/weekly etc cvsup. this is a trivial bit of coding hardly worth
attention, but if it might be of use to you, you can find it here:
http://www.b7j0c.org/conte
On 28 jun 2007, at 22.02, Greg Meredith wrote:
Thomas,
Thanks for the reply. My thinking was that once you have a
polymorphic form, why single out any other? Less moving parts makes
for less maintenance, etc.
Ok, sorry if my reply seemed harsh. You are of course right, that
having f
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Greg Meredith wrote:
Haskellians,
Once you have a polymorphic let, why do you need 'let' in the base
language, at all? Is it possible to formulate Haskell entirely with
do-notation where there is a standard monad for let environments?
Probably this was all di
Thomas,
Thanks for the reply. My thinking was that once you have a polymorphic form,
why single out any other? Less moving parts makes for less maintenance, etc.
Best wishes,
--greg
On 6/28/07, Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 28 jun 2007, at 21.17, Greg Meredith wrote:
>
> On
On 28 jun 2007, at 21.17, Greg Meredith wrote:
Once you have a polymorphic let, why do you need 'let' in the base
language, at all? Is it possible to formulate Haskell entirely with
do-notation where there is a standard monad for let environments?
Probably this was all discussed before in
toInt = id
fromInt = id
?
On 28 jun 2007, at 21.16, peterv wrote:
I’m trying to get the SOE graphics library to compile for Win32
using the latest libraries.
I fixed a couple of imports, but in the file GraphicsTypes.hs, the
functions toInt/fromInt are used, which are now obsolete:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:16:37PM +0200, peterv wrote:
> I'm trying to get the SOE graphics library to compile for Win32 using the
> latest libraries.
>
> I fixed a couple of imports, but in the file GraphicsTypes.hs, the functions
> toInt/fromInt are used, which are now obsolete:
>
> type Dimen
Haskellians,
Once you have a polymorphic let, why do you need 'let' in the base language,
at all? Is it possible to formulate Haskell entirely with do-notation where
there is a standard monad for let environments? Probably this was all
discussed before in the design deliberations for the language
I'm trying to get the SOE graphics library to compile for Win32 using the
latest libraries.
I fixed a couple of imports, but in the file GraphicsTypes.hs, the functions
toInt/fromInt are used, which are now obsolete:
type Dimension = Int
toDimension:: Win32.INT -> Dimension
fromDimens
Hi Daniil,
I had a look at the paper and associated code that Oleg refers to there is no
special parsing taking place:
From Vector/read-examples.hs:
v3 = do
let m1 = $(dAM [[1,2],[3,4]])
s <- readFile "Vector/example-data.txt"
listMatRow (read s) (\(m2::AVector Double a) ->
Paul Hudak wrote:
As an aside, looking at your code a bit closer, I see this:
(polygon [(x,y),(a,b),(x,y)]))
where
b = y + side * sin(pi/3)
a = x + side * cos(pi/3)
Something is not right here -- you repeat (x,y) as a vertex. Probably
the third vertex shou
Jeremy Shaw wrote:
>> What is the status of the MIME Strike Force?
>
> Currently it is on hold while I work on some other higher priority
> projects. But, I do hope to get back to it soon. (Or, perhaps someone
> else will have time to work on it).
OK. Good to hear it is still alive, if slumbering
2007/6/28, Pasqualino 'Titto' Assini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 23:28:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In his system, the type of the matrix includes includes the matrix
> size and dimensions, so invalid operations like improper matrix
> multiplication can be rejected statically.
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 23:28:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In his system, the type of the matrix includes includes the matrix
> size and dimensions, so invalid operations like improper matrix
> multiplication can be rejected statically. And yet, his library
> permits matrices read from files.
R
>From my point of view it is a real shame that we don't have a reliable one yet!
What is with all that mumble of reusable code, interoperability and enhanced
stabilty if you can't use/proof it because it is a nightmare to use it in a
common project. Where common project means: windows and office
Hello Andrew,
Thursday, June 28, 2007, 1:28:05 AM, you wrote:
> Wow, wait a sec - case expressions are allowed to have guards too??
btw, it's used to implement boolean switches:
case () of
_ | a>0 -> 1
| a<0 -> -1
| otherwise -> 0
--
Best regards,
Bulat
> From: Tim Docker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Alistair Bayley wrote:
>
> > I want to interface Takusen with MS Sql Server,
> > but AFAICT the recommended C API is OLE DB, which
> > is a COM API.
>
> An alternative would be to write a takusen <-> freetds binding
> (http://www.freetds.org/). T
Michael T. Richter:
> http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html
>
> Short summary: any data you put into SQLite3 may or may not come out
> as text. :D
Thanks, Michael. (I'm forwarding this to the list again because there is
at least one other person interested.)
Well, I've read that page before and
21 matches
Mail list logo
