Adam Langley imperialviolet.org> writes:
> Just a heads up; PHO has written nice bindings to much of OpenSSL:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/HsOpenSSL-0.3.1
Thanks for pointing it out. It looks like PHO has done some good work there.
- Hitesh
Don Stewart galois.com> writes:
>
> Shall we merge nano-md5 into this lib, and deprecate nano-md5 itself?
> Seems like a good time to consolidate, and produce a single openssl
> binding.
>
It's tempting, but I would really hate to lose nano-md5 as it is
today. I thought your concept was a gr
Am Montag, 11. Februar 2008 21:44 schrieben Sie:
> Alfonso Acosta wrote:
> >> So type-level + parametrized-data is my vote. But don't let's spend too
> >> much time discussing the name. ;-)
> >
> > Fair enough. type-level + parameterized-data it is then (unless
> > someone else has a better sugges
Am Montag, 11. Februar 2008 14:44 schrieb Ross Paterson:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:24:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Am Montag, 11. Februar 2008 02:09 schrieb Don Stewart:
> > > […]
> > >
> > > * Imlib 0.1.1. Uploaded by Cale Gibbard. [120]Imlib: Added by
> > >CaleGibbard,
Hello,
I was recently looking at the STM library, and I have a question about
the function "unsafeIOToSTM". Can anyone explain to me what is unsafe
about it, and what sort of use would be considered "safe"?
Thanks,
John
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Has
Hello,
http://cvs.haskell.org/Hugs/pages/libraries/base/Foreign-C-Types.html ..
I want to look at the actual code for these C types so that I can see how
the instances of Storable for each type are coded so e.g. I can see how
sizeOf/allignment are coded.
Thanks, Vasili
__
Ok, I'll leave it up there as a separate package then. :)
-- Don
hitesh.jasani:
> Don,
>
> It's tempting, but I would really hate to lose nano-md5 as it is
> today. I thought your concept was a great idea to inspire people to
> start small to get a feel for developing Haskell libraries. The
>
Hello,
I get funny results when I call getSymbolicLinkStatus in ghc 6.8.2 on
Ubuntu 7.10. This happens on several systems and has been confirmed by
other people. Though, some people on almost the exact same system
claimed to not see it at all. Here is an interactive example with
ghci, note how the
Hi
> The following code will on Linux print three strings each followed by a NULL
> byte:
>
> module Main where
>
> putStr0 = putStr $ s ++ "\0"
>
> main = do
> putStr0 "Hello"
> putStr0 "Hello"
> putStr0 "Hello"
>
> On Windows however it will print nothing!
You missed out an s in pu
SevenThunders wrote:
> ... Really
> all that's needed though is a tool that can automagically wrap a homegrown
> static or even dynamic library that contains the needed components of the
> GHC run time library along with the additional user code. I know all the
> object files are available as are
Hi,
Excuse me for the subject, but IMHO is absolutely true. Anyhow, the
purpose of this message is not merely to rant about it (which I know
doesn't help) but to illustrate the possible impression of a Haskell
newcomers.
It's been a long long time since I last used arrays in Haskell (lists
are no
On Feb 12, 2008, at 14:24 , Galchin Vasili wrote:
http://cvs.haskell.org/Hugs/pages/libraries/base/Foreign-C-
Types.html .. I want to look at the actual code for these C types
so that I can see how the instances of Storable for each type are
coded so e.g. I can see how sizeOf/allignmen
2008/2/12 Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The following code will on Linux print three strings each followed by a NULL
> byte:
>
> module Main where
>
> putStr0 = putStr $ s ++ "\0"
>
> main = do
> putStr0 "Hello"
> putStr0 "Hello"
> putStr0 "Hello"
>
> On Windows however it wil
Thanks. Both this answer and Luke's make perfect sense.
John
On Feb 12, 2008 12:41 PM, Stephan Friedrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> John Lato wrote:
> > I was recently looking at the STM library, and I have a question about
> > the function "unsafeIOToSTM". Can anyone explain to
2008/2/12 Uwe Hollerbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well... I dunno. Looking at the source to GHC.Real, I see
>
> infinity, notANumber :: Rational
> infinity = 1 :% 0
> notANumber = 0 :% 0
>
> This is actually the reason I imported GHC.Real, because just plain %
> normalizes the rational number it cr
Hello,
John Lato wrote:
I was recently looking at the STM library, and I have a question about
the function "unsafeIOToSTM". Can anyone explain to me what is unsafe
about it, and what sort of use would be considered "safe"?
it's unsafe to perform IO inside of a transaction as it can't be undo
On Feb 12, 2008 6:12 AM, Jan-Willem Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:50 AM, David Benbennick wrote:
>
> > On Feb 11, 2008 10:18 PM, Uwe Hollerbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> If I fire up ghci, import
> >> Data.Ratio and GHC.Real, and then ask about the type of
The following code will on Linux print three strings each followed by a NULL
byte:
module Main where
putStr0 = putStr $ s ++ "\0"
main = do
putStr0 "Hello"
putStr0 "Hello"
putStr0 "Hello"
On Windows however it will print nothing! In order to trigger printing I
have to change the de
On Feb 12, 2008 8:38 PM, Jeremy Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get funny results when I call getSymbolicLinkStatus in ghc 6.8.2 on
> Ubuntu 7.10. This happens on several systems and has been confirmed by
> other people.
Currently I'm looking at hsc2hs for this bug. On a 32 bit box here:
int
On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:50 AM, David Benbennick wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008 10:18 PM, Uwe Hollerbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
If I fire up ghci, import
Data.Ratio and GHC.Real, and then ask about the type of "infinity",
it
tells me Rational, which as far as I can tell is Ratio Integer...?
Yes
On Feb 12, 2008 6:28 PM, John Lato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was recently looking at the STM library, and I have a question about
> the function "unsafeIOToSTM". Can anyone explain to me what is unsafe
> about it, and what sort of use would be considered "safe"?
A few things. Fir
On Feb 12, 2008 10:44 PM, Adam Langley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently I'm looking at hsc2hs for this bug. On a 32 bit box here:
hsc2hs is forgiven; if you build with #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 32
then the structure is 96 bytes and the 64-bit offset is, indeed, at
offset 88.
However, if you
"Richard A. O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the subject of data types, I've recently seen Haskell code using
> data Foo ... = Foo { ... }
> where I would have used newtype instead of data. When is it a good
> idea to avoid newtype?
When the code was written before newtype was int
Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Ben Franksen wrote:
...and the Unimo paper[1] explains how to easily write a 'correct' ListT.
Are you sure? Maybe I am missing something, but I don't
see any claim that the Unimo ListT satisfies the laws any
more than the old mtl ListT.
ListT-Done-Right could also be de
I wrote:
>> Floating point intentionally trades accuracy for speed,
Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
> 1. This is not a possible "trade-off" or not. In scientific/engineering
> computation there is really no choice, since you have to compute
> logarithms, trigonometric functions, etc., and some inacc
Yitzchak Gale writes:
Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
Would you say that *no* typical floating-point software is reliable?
It depends on how you define "reliable".
Floating point intentionally trades accuracy for speed,
...
It used to be true - and may still be - that the engineers
who implem
Ben Franksen wrote:
> ...and the Unimo paper[1] explains how to easily write a 'correct' ListT.
> BTW, Unimo is an extreme case of the monad laws holding only w.r.t.
> the 'right' equality, i.e. in the laws m == m' is to be understood as
> observe_monad m == observe_monad m'
> (and even this '=='
Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
> Would you say that *no* typical floating-point software is reliable?
It depends on how you define "reliable".
Floating point intentionally trades accuracy for speed,
leaving it to the user to worry about round-off errors.
It is usually not too hard to get the probabili
David Benbennick wrote:
>> Some months ago I pointed out that Ratio Int (which is an Ord
>> instance) doesn't satisfy this property. I provided a patch to fix
>> the problem, but my bug report was closed as wontfix:
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1517.
Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
> I
Svein Ove Aas wrote:
A program to do this follows for your convenience.
#include
int main() {
int i;
for (int i=0; i<3; i++)
puts("Hello\0");
This will have the same effect as puts("Hello").
Maybe putchar(0) will actually output the NUL.
Zun.
___
I'm pleased to announce the first release of Leksah, an IDE for
Haskell written in Haskell. Leksah is intended as a practical tool
to support the Haskell development process.
This is an unfinished pre-release with bugs and open ends.
However, I decided to make a first announcement, hop
On Feb 12, 2008 11:04 PM, Adam Langley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> structure filled in. HsUnix.h has a wrapper around lstat for exactly
> this reason, however ltrace shows it calling the wrong one.
So (finally!) the real issue:
hsc2hs has a C preprocessor prelude (utils/hsc2hs/template-hsc.h)
wh
32 matches
Mail list logo
