It all started with this:
Loading package binary-0.5.0.1 ... can't load .so/.DLL for:
HSbinary-0.5.0.1 (dlopen(libHSbinary-0.5.0.1.dylib, 9): image not found)
so I tried
> cabal upgrade binary
Resolving dependencies...
Configuring containers-0.2.0.1...
Preprocessing library containers-0.2.0
On 2009-10-22 14:44, Robert Atkey wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 20:12 +0200, Ben Franksen wrote:
Since 'some' is defined recursively, this creates an infinite production for
numbers that you can neither print nor otherwise analyse in finite time.
Yes, sorry, I should have been more careful the
On 2009-10-22 14:56, Robert Atkey wrote:
Yes, it might have been that, OTOH I'm sure I saw it in some Haskell
code. Maybe I was imagining it.
There is some related Haskell code in the Agda repository.
Do you know of a characterisation of what languages having a possibly
infinite amount of non
The workaround is for a script to traverse the filesystem and generate a
list of modules that can then be copied into the .cabal for haddock and
Setup.hs for hpc. If anyone else is trying to do the same, here's the code:
http://hpaste.org/fastcgi/hpaste.fcgi/view?id=11224#a11224
script copied bel
Your pattern in the head of the function "chromoResult (a:b:c:xs)"
requires the list to have at least three elements in it. I doubt that
all the recursive calls take this into consideration...
2009/10/27 satorisanitarium :
> I'm trying to parse a list of numbers plus four diferent signs (+-*/)
> i
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:38 PM, satorisanitarium
wrote:
> I'm trying to parse a list of numbers plus four diferent signs (+-*/)
> in this way:
>
*snip*
> I suspect my approach is flawed but i have exausted my ideas.
> I need a fresh approach so if anybody would be kind enough and just
> give me
I'm trying to parse a list of numbers plus four diferent signs (+-*/)
in this way:
Lets say the list is "32+5/46" result would be "2+5/4"
I get:
"2+5/4*** Exception: geneticSimple.hs:(55,0)-(65,35): Non-exhaustive
patterns in function chromoResult
If the list is "32+5**6" result would be "2+5*6"
I have a cabal package that defines a few dozen modules, and I'm
hoping to generate documentation and code coverage for all modules
without listing each module explicitly.
currently my .cabal includes:
library
exposed-modules:
Language.Idl.Data,
Language.Idl.Merge,
Language.Idl.Parser,
duncan.coutts:
> On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 17:00 +0100, Daniel Fischer wrote:
>
> > Look at the sources:
> >
> > hGetLine :: Handle -> IO ByteString
> > hGetLine h = wantReadableHandle "Data.ByteString.hGetLine" h $ \ handle_ ->
> > do
> > case haBufferMode handle_ of
> >NoBuffering -> e
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Colin Paul Adams
wrote:
>> "Svein" == Svein Ove Aas writes:
>
> Svein> Known bugs: * Occasionally, the haskell-indentation parser
> Svein> will get stuck on what it considers to be invalid haskell
>
> Quite often.
>
> Svein> code, and refuse to acce
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Bulat Ziganshin
wrote:
> Hello Kim-Ee,
>
> Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 8:08:27 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Just for completeness' sake, bottom is a value for any expression.
>> Wouldn't making the else clause optional by defaulting to "undefined"
>> worthy of consideration
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 17:00 +0100, Daniel Fischer wrote:
> Look at the sources:
>
> hGetLine :: Handle -> IO ByteString
> hGetLine h = wantReadableHandle "Data.ByteString.hGetLine" h $ \ handle_ -> do
> case haBufferMode handle_ of
>NoBuffering -> error "no buffering"
>_other
> "Svein" == Svein Ove Aas writes:
Svein> Known bugs: * Occasionally, the haskell-indentation parser
Svein> will get stuck on what it considers to be invalid haskell
Quite often.
Svein> code, and refuse to accept your commands; this includes,
Svein> mainly, haskell-newline
Hello Kim-Ee,
Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 8:08:27 PM, you wrote:
> Just for completeness' sake, bottom is a value for any expression.
> Wouldn't making the else clause optional by defaulting to "undefined"
> worthy of consideration for Evil Haskell?
in this case you will get an exception when co
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote:
>
> Hi Brent,
>
> Re: '"if" expressions, not statements' is an elegant clarification, one
> definitely for the haskellwiki, if not there already.
>
> Just for completeness' sake, bottom is a value for any expression.
> Wouldn't making the else c
Second Call For Papers
19th International Workshop on Functional
and (Constraint) Logic Programming
Madrid, Spain, January 17, 2010
http://bab
Hi Brent,
Re: '"if" expressions, not statements' is an elegant clarification, one
definitely for the haskellwiki, if not there already.
Just for completeness' sake, bottom is a value for any expression.
Wouldn't making the else clause optional by defaulting to "undefined"
worthy of considerat
On 25 Oct 2009, at 15:51, Curt Sampson wrote:
Funny, I do too. Still, when Luxuria opened for them in Vancouver
in the
'90s, I started to think about what Howard Devoto was doing
Anyone who recognises The Mark E. Smith is worthy of being master of
all he surveys.
But in others, su
On 27 Oct 2009, at 15:47, Thomas DuBuisson wrote:
If you wanted to make sure it didn't have to do with ghci then you
should have compiled the original code, not tested different
functions.
That is a very good point!
On 27 Oct 2009, at 16:00, Daniel Fischer wrote:
Look at the sources:
Am Dienstag 27 Oktober 2009 16:47:12 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
> Iain,
> If you wanted to make sure it didn't have to do with ghci then you
> should have compiled the original code, not tested different
> functions. The code you provided works fine compiled and I too am
> curious what is going on
Iain,
If you wanted to make sure it didn't have to do with ghci then you
should have compiled the original code, not tested different
functions. The code you provided works fine compiled and I too am
curious what is going on when you run it in ghci.
Thomas
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Iain B
[1 of 1] Compiling Main ( sha1.lhs, interpreted )
import qualified Data.ByteString as B
main = B.getLine >>= B.putStrLn
Ok, modules loaded: Main.
*Main> :main
*** Exception: no buffering
And just to make sure it's not something to do with GHCi or anything
like that
main = get
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Philippos Apolinarius
wrote:
>
> In a private email to Ketil Malde, I said that Ocaml programmers use the
> preprocessor to solve the problem of character encoding:
>
> ocamlopt -pp myfilter.exe myprogram.ml -o myoutput.exe
>
> I wonder whether a similar solution
In a private email to Ketil Malde, I said that Ocaml programmers use the
preprocessor to solve the problem of character encoding:
ocamlopt -pp myfilter.exe myprogram.ml -o myoutput.exe
I wonder whether a similar solution could be used with Haskell. I am new to
Haskell, but I suppose that Haskel
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 07:49:14PM -0500, Tim Wawrzynczak wrote:
> Yes, an if statement must have both 'then' and 'else' branches. As an
> example, what if you had
>
> let a = if b == 2 then True else False
>
> and you were missing an else branch? What would 'a' get assigned to?
>
> The if sta
Hello Ketil!
Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:06:50AM +0100 you wrote:
> > At which point you probably want to make use of iconv, so you might as
> > well support all iconv-supported encodings.
>
> Interestingly, Wikipedia [0] says that "Unicode-aware programs are
> required to display, print and manipul
Colin Paul Adams writes:
> Brandon> So yes, it's reasonable to "blame" the language (spec).
On the other hand, the sooner users can get moving to utf-8, the sooner
we can get eliminate these kinds of problems.
> Note also that it mentions the Unicode character set, not a particular
> Unicod
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:05 -0700, John Velman wrote:
> I'm on OS X Leopard 10.5.8, using ghc 6.10.4 from Haskell Platform.
>
> I'm trying to get a static .a library, callable from C, that I can use in
> an OS X Cocoa program. I've tried a very simple case (the one in Haskell
> Wiki Tutorials,"ca
28 matches
Mail list logo
