Dear all,
just a reminder for our monthly Haskell get-together in Munich, Cafe
Puck, tomorrow (Tuesday, 29th, 19h30).
If you will join and didn't already click the button, you can do it here:
http://www.haskell-munich.de/dates
Have a nice day,
Heinrich
--
--
hoerde...@funktional.info
www.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
>
> On 28/11/2011, at 6:10 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>>> "You must be logged in to submit an answer."
>>>
>>> I don't know how many opinions you'll lose from that, but you'll
>>> certainly lose mine.
>>
>> Well, I thought that was part
On 28/11/2011, at 6:10 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
>> "You must be logged in to submit an answer."
>>
>> I don't know how many opinions you'll lose from that, but you'll
>> certainly lose mine.
>
> Well, I thought that was part of the point: some way of having
> "verified" votes (i.e. you d
On 28 November 2011 15:47, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
>
> On 25/11/2011, at 11:01 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just added the polls feature to Haskellers.com, and created an
>> initial poll about mascots[1]. Let me know if there are any issues.
>
> "You must be logged in to submi
On 25/11/2011, at 11:01 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just added the polls feature to Haskellers.com, and created an
> initial poll about mascots[1]. Let me know if there are any issues.
"You must be logged in to submit an answer."
I don't know how many opinions you'll lose fro
I thought this matter was on the back burner.
Add me for a No mascot vote.
Have a good one.
2011/11/27 heathmatlock
> Haskellers.com poll:
> Yes 52 votes (50%), 22 verified votes (53%)
> No 51 votes (49%), 19 verified votes (46%)
>
> Email:
> Yes 14 (64%)
> No8 (36%)
>
>
> Seems a bit divid
On Nov 27, 2011 7:51 PM, "Ivan Lazar Miljenovic"
wrote:
> Ummm. how are you doing the weighting?
( (Percent of yes or no vote for poll 1 * total num votes poll1) +
(Percent of yes or no votes for poll 2 * total num votes of poll 2)
) / (total num votes for poll 1 + total num votes for poll
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
wrote:
> Ummm. how are you doing the weighting?
>
> How do you verify that people didn't vote in both?
Given that the Haskellers pool had a lot more votes, I'd just ignore
e-mail votes on the assumption that most people that voted by e-m
Ummm. how are you doing the weighting?
How do you verify that people didn't vote in both?
On 28 November 2011 12:35, heathmatlock wrote:
> Weighted average of the verified results:
> Yes 57%
> No 42%
>
> --
> Heath Matlock
> +1 256 274 4225
>
> __
Weighted average of the verified results:
Yes 57%
No 42%
--
Heath Matlock
+1 256 274 4225
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On 11/25/11 9:10 AM, Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
IMO, a book author should expect that an URL like
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/ could change to point to a new
version, since it doesn't mention a version number or date anywhere.
The most sensible directory structure would be:
http://www.ha
-1 (no mascot). As a amusing as a slacker dude might be, out doesn't send
the right message.There's a reason why RMS isn't the mascot for FSF, for
example.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Phone
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskel
Heh, I miscounted the email poll (turns out to be pretty difficult to
grep for answers). Correct email results (as of writing):
Yes 15 (65%)
No8 (35%)
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:37 PM, heathmatlock wrote:
> Haskellers.com poll:
> Yes 52 votes (50%), 22 verified votes (53%)
> No 51 votes (49%)
Haskellers.com poll:
Yes 52 votes (50%), 22 verified votes (53%)
No 51 votes (49%), 19 verified votes (46%)
Email:
Yes 14 (64%)
No8 (36%)
Seems a bit divided.
--
Heath Matlock
+1 256 274 4225
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Yes
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:11 PM, heathmatlock wrote:
> Question: Do you want a mascot?
> Answers:
> Yes
> No
>
> --
> This is an attempt to figure out if this idea is going anywhere.
--
Heath Matlock
+1 256 274 4225
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing lis
On 11/27/2011 04:27 AM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr: randomIV is now much faster, API is the same, upgrade ASAP to
avoid painful slowdowns.
Version 0.7 of clientsession brought with it a much enhanced
encryption and hashing algorithm, courtesy of Felipe Lessa. Beginning
with this versi
Yes and I like that one. :D
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Liyang HU wrote:
> On 25 November 2011 17:28, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <
> ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> And we already have one: http://paraiso-lang.org/ikmsm/books/c80.html
> > Uh. W...T...F...???
> > Do I want to kno
Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
B.
Does anybody care about wxHaskell?
Actually there has been quite a bit of work on wxHaskell recently, although
most has not made it into the mainline yet. The archives of wxhaskell-users
and wxhaskell-devel (both at Sourceforge) contain t
18 matches
Mail list logo