On 11/05/07, Andrew Coppin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks.
How difficult would it be to implement Mathematica in Haskell?
The language itself; very easy I'd say. The maths libraries ...
years. So if you just want something to play with I'm sure you could
get something working quickly.
On 26/04/07, Bas van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
test = putStrLn $ toIsString $ do I
need
MultiLine
String
On 22/04/07, Nikolay Metchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys,
I have decided to try and get back into Haskell recently. I have used it in
the past but have forgotten large chunks.
I am trying to express the logic of a particular card game. For this purpose
I need to be able to order cards in
On 09/03/07, Frozz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Haskell ppl,
I'm trying to solve a problem that had been bothering me for a long time. I'm
trying to create index and display the index in Hugs as well as an output text
file.
dispTable is a pure function so you'll get the same result
On 23/02/07, Thomas Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seemed like a handy thing to have an example of, so I added it to
my growing repo of sample haskell programs and tried running it. But I
was unsuccessful.
Your program works for me both compiled or using runghc:
Linux lonlsd62
On 22/02/07, Melissa O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But talk is cheap. What about some actual numbers, and some code for
some actual implementations...?
Perhaps you could go the last 1% and upload a Primes package to
Hackage and forever save us from inferior sieves ? (I enjoyed your
paper
On 2/10/07, Peter Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prelude putStrLn $ concatMap (flip (++)\n) $ map show $ [(x,y,() x y)
|x - [True,False],y - [True,False]]
This can be simplified slightly to:
Prelude putStrLn . unlines . map show $ [(x, y, x y) | x -
[True, False], y - [True, False]]
- Joe
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:46:04PM +, Graham Klyne wrote:
If your calculation really needs to update the cache state as it goes
along, then I agree that it needs to be run in the state monad. But even
then, I'd be inclined to look for sub-calculations that can be evaluated as
ordinary
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:54:27AM +, Graham Klyne wrote:
My *intuition* here is that the problem is with countLeaves2, in that it
must build the computation for the given [sub]tree before it can start to
evaluate it. Maybe this is why other responses talk about changing the
state
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:38:06PM +, Graham Klyne wrote:
getOrCachePositionValue pos =
do { mcache - gets (findPos pos) -- Query cache for position
; case mcache of
Just cached - return (cachedVal cached) -- Return cached value
Nothing -
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could give me some help with this problem ?
I'm trying to hold some state in a StateMonad whilst I iterate over a
large tree, and finding that I'm running out of stack space very
quickly. The simplified program below exhibits the same problem.
This is the first
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:28:11PM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:54:18AM +0900, Koji Nakahara wrote:
Hi,
I think the problem is in the State Monad itself;
State Monad is lazy to compute its state.
I am not a haskell expert, and there may be better ideas.
12 matches
Mail list logo
