I mentioned this to him on Twitter a while ago. Presumably it has to
do with the fact that he's no longer at Galois.
Another unfortunate fact is that ACOVEA is at this point unmaintained,
and that is why the official homepage for it was removed. When I
emailed the author, he said he couldn't affor
Can we see some examples of the graphics it can produce?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> I am extremely pleased to announce a "developer preview" release of the
> diagrams framework [1] for declarative drawing. This is a
> well-thought-out, well-documented, working release
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:22 AM, KC wrote:
> Is there an efficient way to generate Euler's totient function for [2,3..n]?
>
> Or an arithmetical sequence?
>
> Or a geometric sequence?
>
> Or some generalized sequence?
Does computing the totient function require obtaining the prime
factorization
Pretty interesting links, thanks.
Unfortunately, if Fortress is to have any chance of success with
programmers, it will need to be straight-line and essentially have
Algol-based syntax.
MATLAB, LabVIEW, Fortran, Java, C, and non-OO C++/random subsets of
C++ rule scientific programming. Unit testi
Hi,
You might want to take a look at http://github.com/nfjinjing/nemesis
which is somewhat related.
Warren
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:41 AM, C K Kashyap wrote:
> Hi All,
> I was thinking about doing an EDSL for Makefile (as an exercise)
> I put down my line of thought here -
> http://hpaste.org/
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Jeff Rubard wrote:
> Haskell CURRY?
> Curried potatoes?
> The lambda calculus?
> Historical actuality?
> SI!
lol wat
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Don Stewart wrote:
> A bit longer term, but yes. So far I've got individual approaches for
> improving performance by finding:
>
> * inlining points
> * strictness flags
> * `par` points
> * LLVM flags
> * RTS GC flags
>
> They just need to be integr
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> Feedback and patches welcome!
Interesting.
Could this be combined with the ACOVEA compiler flag thing you did a
while back to produce a tool that would automatically improve
performance of programs on a fixed architecture/environment just by
r
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Mads Lindstrøm
wrote:
> Looking at Wikipedia I can see that COBOL 2002[1] got user defined
> functions, but prior it was impossible to define your own functions. You
> could define sub-rutines (semantically similar to jsr/gosub in
> assembler/basic), but not functi
Wow. Quite ambitious.
Was this inspired by work at your current employer like with Atom and
some of the other stuff you've released?
Warren
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Tom Hawkins wrote:
> Here is a new library for analyzing PowerPC programs [1]. At this
> point it does instruction set si
I like boobs
I like functional programming
Happy New Years
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Henk-Jan van Tuyl wrote:
> I love lambda's:
> http://hawtness.com/2009/12/30/wtf-girl-photo-more-reasons-why-half-life-is-awesome/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Am I the only one who finds this stuff confusing as hell?
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Robert Greayer wrote:
> The crux here is that the source code of hakyll, released on hackage, is not
> a derivative of Pandoc (it contains, as far as I understand it, no Pandoc
> source code). A compiled ex
Interesting to see actual generated code.
Is this like code generation systems for database applications where
you stick stuff into string templates (e.g., a generator in Ruby on
Rails), or is it actually compiling an embedded domain specific
language?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Tom Hawkins
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Gracjan Polak wrote:
> Of course commercial options are available on case by case basis.
When Acme.Dont licensing has made you a billionaire, remember the little people.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Emil Axelsson wrote:
> I don't see why you shouldn't
> I don't know
I'll take that as an unqualified "yes". Shawty snappin'!
Warren
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/l
I see that section 4.1 of the user guide -
http://feldspar.sourceforge.net/documents/language/FeldsparLanguage.html#htoc23
- includes an example involving autocorrelation.
Does this mean I could use Feldspare to easily build my own Autotune
program? I love T-Pain and Autotune the News!
Warren
On
$83 and "3-4 weeks" for a 300 page book? Oy vey.
Warren
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:24 AM, S. Doaitse Swierstra
wrote:
> I am happy to announce that the rworked lecture notes for the 6th Advance
> Functional programming summer school have become available.
_
2009/6/7 Andrew Smith :
> Facebook
,.-‘”...``~.,..
.,.-”...“-.,
.
>From what I recall of Mathematica the language, it has more in common
with Lisp than Haskell: it's symbolic, dynamically typed, etc.
Allegedly Wolfram spent years on this; if it has any merit,
duplicating it would be difficult.
What I'd like to see most is WolframAlpha in action. At this point i
19 matches
Mail list logo
