Hello Kaveh,
Sunday, August 6, 2006, 5:40:26 PM, you wrote:
> I think we need a subset of haskell as a new language (or as a
> developing pattern) to work with and teach and learn more easily as
> you have mentioned.
it called Helium :) but in general problem is what Haskell's way to
deal with
I think we need a subset of haskell as a new language (or as a
developing pattern) to work with and teach and learn more easily as
you have mentioned.
I had read a text about mathematics which was something like this :
"New mathematic theories does not populize because of their fabiolus
logical th
Hi Kaveh,
Maybe this is not a proper question but I think It has a point. Why
Not Compiling To Java Or C#?
Yhc does both :) Java as an interpretter for the haskell byte code, C#
as a native MSIL generator. We also have Python as well as C, if
you're feeling adventurous.
Thanks
Neil
__
Hello Kaveh,
Sunday, August 6, 2006, 12:54:01 PM, you wrote:
>> how can we decrease Haskell popularity?
> Why? Because someone must prevent mean programmers to try Haskell? Or
> it is a bit of old holy codex? Or maybe I must feal tired of hearing
> newbies questions?
all the three and especiall
Then I must apologize again. (Communications and activities are so
attractive that I cann't prevent my self from it. One aspect of it is
to apologize. :D).
Thankyou and Thank you too! ;)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.h
On 06/08/06, Kaveh Shahbazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can we decrease Haskell popularity?
Why? Because someone must prevent mean programmers to try Haskell? Or
it is a bit of old holy codex? Or maybe I must feal tired of hearing
newbies questions?
No, no. He meant a mental exercise. Y
I made a mistake : popularity! This was a meaning that described my
thoughts at that moment.
Let me make it clear by another question : Can someone say perl is popular?
If we see it that way, I meant a good and efficient community-based
expansion and some good tools to use.
how can we decrease H
On 8/5/06, Piotr Kalinowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Yes, yes. I'm simply not sure if making changes only to reach more and> more people is good.These changes are good as long as they possibly add something valuable beside popularity and they don't introduce significant downsides. My point was t
On 05/08/06, Antonio Cangiano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because we are humans and as such, we generally love to share our passions
with other people.
From a less sociological standpoint, a larger user base implies faster
development of interesting projects, more libraries, books, user groups,
co
Hello Kaveh,
Saturday, August 5, 2006, 11:52:16 AM, you wrote:
> I do not meant to compile Haskell to MSIL/JVM. I meant to compile
> Haskell to the Java or C# itself!
for what? btw, there is a jhc compiler (http://repetae.net/john/) that
translates Haskell to ANSI C which allows to reach OCaml-l
Hello Antonio,
Saturday, August 5, 2006, 7:07:17 PM, you wrote:
>>> But there must be a way to populize Haskell!
>> What for?
> On the other hand, individuals that need to belong to an elite, and
> the RTFM crowd, will experience a further frustration to feed their insecure
> personality.
the
On 8/5/06, Piotr Kalinowski wrote:
On 05/08/06, Kaveh Shahbazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> But there must be a way to populize Haskell!What for?Because we are humans and as such, we generally love to share our passions with other people.
From a less sociological standpoint, a larger user base imp
On 05/08/06, Kaveh Shahbazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But there must be a way to populize Haskell!
What for?
Regards,
Piotr Kalinowski
--
Intelligence is like a river: the deeper it is, the less noise it makes
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskel
I do not meant to compile Haskell to MSIL/JVM. I meant to compile
Haskell to the Java or C# itself! And GHC will be there for a high
performance language (but still O'Caml is better by the time). But
Java proves that in enterprise solution, performance is a complex
factor of many thing other than
1 & 2 -
Maybe this is not a proper question but I think It has a point. Why
Not Compiling To Java Or C#? What is the need of implementing a class
interoperability between Haskell and other plateforms? Maybe we donot
need that. Haskell can be the big infrastructure and code snippets in
Java or C# c
15 matches
Mail list logo
