On 8/21/08, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the best result here would be to put a CouchDB binding
on hackage.
Is anyone in a position to do this?
As for myself, honestly, I did not plan to do this at this time as I
am busy with other stuff (Yhc Core conversion). I'd be glad to
Actually few days ago I run into CouchDB and started
to prototype a binding using JSON and Curl from hackage.
Once the base functionality is supported, I could post it
for review.
Adam
On Aug 21, 2008, at 11:29 AM, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
Don & All,
On 8/21/08, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTE
Don & All,
On 8/21/08, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the best result here would be to put a CouchDB binding
> on hackage.
>
> Is anyone in a position to do this?
As for myself, honestly, I did not plan to do this at this time as I
am busy with other stuff (Yhc Core conversion)
magnus:
> Sorry for not responding earlier but I didn't pay attention to this
> thread at the time. The reason for finding it now is that I listened
> to the FLOSS Weekly's episode on CouchDB yesterday; I stumbled on this
> email from a search for haskell+couchdb.
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2008 at 4:14
Sorry for not responding earlier but I didn't pay attention to this
thread at the time. The reason for finding it now is that I listened
to the FLOSS Weekly's episode on CouchDB yesterday; I stumbled on this
email from a search for haskell+couchdb.
On Sat, Jan 5, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Dimitry Golubovs
Hi,
Don asked:
> Are we likely to see the couchdb bindings released as a standalone
> library for the wider community?
Let me explain a little bit why the CouchDB module appears in the Yhc repo.
As the next stage of the Yhc/Javascript project, I am trying to set up
a web service where people mi
