On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:02, Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
So is there any difference between the interpretation of MonadPlus and
Alternative, or is the only difference between them that the former applies
to Monad whereas the latter applies to Applicative?
Somewhat OT, but this led me to
On 10/29/11 11:02 PM, Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
Hey everyone,
What is the difference between MonadPlus and Alternative? In my mind, it would make sense for the
difference to be that the former provides and semantics (i.e., x `mplus` y means do both x
and y) whereas the latter provides or
Hey everyone,
What is the difference between MonadPlus and Alternative? In my mind, it would
make sense for the difference to be that the former provides and semantics
(i.e., x `mplus` y means do both x and y) whereas the latter provides or
semantics (i.e., x | y means do x or y but not
MonadPlus is `or` semantics, as is Alternative. It does, indeed, reflect
the Applicative/Monad difference.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Gregory Crosswhite
gcrosswh...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey everyone,
What is the difference between MonadPlus and Alternative? In my mind, it
would make sense
