On Dec 14, 2007 5:14 AM, Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are two standard ways to decompose a monad into two adjoint
> functors: the Kleisli decomposition and the Eilenberg-Moore decomposition.
>
> However, neither of these categories is a subcategory of Hask in an
> obvious way, so
Dan Weston wrote:
apfelmus wrote:
Luke Palmer wrote:
Isn't a type which is both a Monad and a Comonad just Identity?
(I'm actually not sure, I'm just conjecting)
Good idea, but it's not the case.
data L a = One a | Cons a (L a) -- non-empty list
Maybe I can entice you to elaborate sli
apfelmus wrote:
Luke Palmer wrote:
Isn't a type which is both a Monad and a Comonad just Identity?
(I'm actually not sure, I'm just conjecting)
Good idea, but it's not the case.
data L a = One a | Cons a (L a) -- non-empty list
Maybe I can entice you to elaborate slightly. From
http://
