"David House" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 31/05/07, Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you're bored... can you come up with a solution to this?
>
> Try using floatToDigits:
> http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Numeric.html#v%3AfloatToDigits
>
> "floatToDigit
Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> > "David House" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >> On 31/05/07, Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> If you're bored... can you come up with a solution to this?
> >>>
> >> Try using floatToDigits:
> >> http://h
"Dougal Stanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 31 May 2007 21:52:33 +0100,
> Jon Fairbairn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, but you didn't say that it's not only silly but
> > demonstrates the opposite of expressiveness as it's all
> > about breaking an abstraction and must be non-portable
>
Jon Fairbairn wrote:
"David House" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 31/05/07, Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you're bored... can you come up with a solution to this?
Try using floatToDigits:
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Numeric.html#v%3Afloa
On 31/05/07, Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that the challenge asks for the "internal" bitmap representation of
an IEEE double-precision integer - not the mathematical binary
expansion. (In particular, things like Infinity and NaN have special bit
sequences.)
Ah, sorry, then disr
On 31 May 2007 21:52:33 +0100, Jon Fairbairn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, but you didn't say that it's not only silly but
demonstrates the opposite of expressiveness as it's all
about breaking an abstraction and must be non-portable code
(because it's definition is that it won't give the same
Andrew Coppin wrote:
> Note that the challenge asks for the "internal" bitmap representation of
> an IEEE double-precision integer
Actually it didn't. It asked for the machine's internal representation
of a double precision float, and you are not guaranteed that this
representation conforms to I
The site seems to be asking for the internal floating point
representation. So it doesn't matter if it's IEEE 754, if the ints are
2-complements, or whatever. I used this code as a quick hack for one of
my programs, but I think it would work in this case. It should work for
any Storable type.
im
On 6/3/07, Rafael Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The site seems to be asking for the internal floating point
representation. So it doesn't matter if it's IEEE 754, if the ints are
2-complements, or whatever. I used this code as a quick hack for one of
my programs, but I think it would work i
almeidaraf:
> On 6/3/07, Rafael Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The site seems to be asking for the internal floating point
> >representation. So it doesn't matter if it's IEEE 754, if the ints are
> >2-complements, or whatever. I used this code as a quick hack for one of
> >my programs, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
