Hey guys,
I didn't see this thread at first, thanks to Johan for bringing it to my
attention.
cereal is a fork of binary, and provided a incremental interface before
binary did.
It also has a few additional combinators like isolate and label, which
is the reason why safecopy uses cereal instead
On 2/27/13 2:17 AM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
Two major problems of lazy bytestrings is that:
* you can't pass it to a C bindings easily.
* doing IO with it without rewriting the chunks, can sometimes (depending
how the lazy bytestring has been produced) result in a serious
degradation of
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 01:22 -0800, wren ng thornton wrote:
On 2/27/13 2:17 AM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
Two major problems of lazy bytestrings is that:
* you can't pass it to a C bindings easily.
* doing IO with it without rewriting the chunks, can sometimes (depending
how the lazy
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 11:59 -0800, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Nicolas Trangez nico...@incubaid.comwrote:
- cereal supports chunk-based 'partial' parsing (runGetPartial). It
looks like support for this is introduced in recent versions of 'binary'
as well
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 07:49 +0100, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:30:40PM +0100, Nicolas Trangez wrote:
...
I've been looking at the same thing lately, and i've been quite surprised, to
say the least, by the usual go-to packages (cereal, binary). Performance wise
this is
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 11:59 -0800, Johan Tibell wrote:
Simon's builder (originally developed in blaze-binary) has been merged
into the bytestring package.
I've been meaning to ask: does this mean that ByteString's concat and
append functions will now be implemented in terms of Builder
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:59:42AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote:
- cereal can output a strict bytestring (runPut) or a lazy one
(runPutLazy), whilst binary only outputs lazy ones (runPut)
The lazy one is more
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:30:40PM +0100, Nicolas Trangez wrote:
All,
In order to implement some network protocol clients recently, I needed
binary serialization of commands and deserialization of responses
('Command - ByteString' and 'ByteString - Response' functions,
preferably for both
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:59:42AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote:
- cereal can output a strict bytestring (runPut) or a lazy one
(runPutLazy), whilst binary only outputs lazy ones (runPut)
The lazy one is more general and you can use toStrict (from bytestring) to
get a strict ByteString from
All,
In order to implement some network protocol clients recently, I needed
binary serialization of commands and deserialization of responses
('Command - ByteString' and 'ByteString - Response' functions,
preferably for both strict as well as lazy ByteStrings).
My go-to packages have always been
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Nicolas Trangez nico...@incubaid.comwrote:
- cereal supports chunk-based 'partial' parsing (runGetPartial). It
looks like support for this is introduced in recent versions of 'binary'
as well (runGetIncremental)
Yes. Binary now support an incremental
On Monday, February 25, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Nicolas Trangez nico...@incubaid.com
(mailto:nico...@incubaid.com) wrote:
- cereal supports chunk-based 'partial' parsing (runGetPartial). It
looks like support for this is introduced in recent
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote:
There are some blog posts and comments out there about merging cereal
and binary, is this what's the goal/going on (cfr runGetIncremental)?
It's most definitely the goal and it's basically done. The only thing I
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Alexander Solla alex.so...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote:
There are some blog posts and comments out there about merging cereal
and binary, is this what's the goal/going on (cfr runGetIncremental)?
That sounds reasonable. If someone sends a pull request Lennart or I will
review and merge it.
Doesn't binary already have it?
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/binary/0.6.4.0/doc/html/Data-Binary.html#g:3
On 26 February 2013 05:06, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On
15 matches
Mail list logo
