Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 03:52 +0200, Marc Weber wrote:
>> 1.)
>> I know I can use
>> Build-Depends: lib == , lib2 < version, lib3 >=
>> version
>> and so on.
>>
>> Do you think it would be useful to introducue some notation
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 03:52 +0200, Marc Weber wrote:
> 1.)
> I know I can use
> Build-Depends: lib == , lib2 < version, lib3 >=
> version
> and so on.
>
> Do you think it would be useful to introducue some notation to indicate
> a "tested with" ?
>
>
1.)
I know I can use
Build-Depends: lib == , lib2 < version, lib3 >=
version
and so on.
Do you think it would be useful to introducue some notation to indicate
a "tested with" ?
Reason, purpose: I think its sometimes the case that a autho
