Re[4]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-08 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Jason, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 9:06:33 PM, you wrote: >> you are right again. so, that remains: you shouldn't suppose that >> user have read 90's GC paper. give a short excerpt of it: how >> generational GC works and how memory usage converts to memory >> footprint. then descriptions of RTS

Re: Re[2]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Jason Dagit
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > Hello Simon, > > Thursday, May 7, 2009, 6:58:02 PM, you wrote: > >>> and completely separate topic - +RTS -s report description also >>> doesn't exist > >> Scroll down in that section I linked to before: > >> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/

Re[2]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 6:58:02 PM, you wrote: >> and completely separate topic - +RTS -s report description also >> doesn't exist > Scroll down in that section I linked to before: > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/runtime-control.html#rts-options-gc you are

Re: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Simon Marlow
On 07/05/2009 15:17, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 5:45:53 PM, you wrote: out of date and say 256k, I've just fixed that). The old generation is allowed to grow to 2x its previous size by default before being collected. you are right. i just checked old logs - s

Re[2]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 5:45:53 PM, you wrote: > out of date and say 256k, I've just fixed that). The old generation is > allowed to grow to 2x its previous size by default before being > collected. you are right. i just checked old logs - seems that previously i just misinterprete

Re: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Simon Marlow
On 07/05/2009 11:51, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 2:04:05 PM, you wrote: I've heard it's hard to contain a long-running Haskell application in a finite amount of memory not exactly. you may alloc fixed pool of memory to application (say, 1gb) if you know that it

Re[2]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 2:04:05 PM, you wrote: >>> I've heard it's hard to contain a long-running Haskell application in >>> a finite amount of memory >> >> not exactly. you may alloc fixed pool of memory to application (say, 1gb) >> if you know that it never need more memory. but as

Re: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Simon Marlow
On 06/05/2009 21:18, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello FFT, Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 11:59:53 PM, you wrote: I've heard it's hard to contain a long-running Haskell application in a finite amount of memory not exactly. you may alloc fixed pool of memory to application (say, 1gb) if you know that it

Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-06 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello FFT, Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 11:59:53 PM, you wrote: > I've heard it's hard to contain a long-running Haskell application in > a finite amount of memory not exactly. you may alloc fixed pool of memory to application (say, 1gb) if you know that it never need more memory. but as far as you d