Re: Re[6]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Incremental array updates

2009-02-27 Thread Eugene Kirpichov
2009/2/27 Bulat Ziganshin : > Hello Eugene, > > Friday, February 27, 2009, 4:42:03 PM, you wrote: > >> I'm exactly basing on them, but they don't have at least these things: > > "them" means Edison or Collections typeclasses? The EdisonAPI. > >>  - Treatment for unboxed types (I don't know yet, wh

Re[6]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Incremental array updates

2009-02-27 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Eugene, Friday, February 27, 2009, 4:42:03 PM, you wrote: > I'm exactly basing on them, but they don't have at least these things: "them" means Edison or Collections typeclasses? > - Treatment for unboxed types (I don't know yet, whether it is > needed; but why do STUArrays have special