Re: Outlook

2006-06-26 Thread Robert G. Werner
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Jarkko Hietaniemi [2006-06-26 18:05]: [snip] address books but they are live in one pile of shit called a PST). Pile of ShiT - now it all finally makes sense! Maybe "Pile of Steamy Turds"? Regards, Oh how that does my soul good. Thank you for that -- In Reach T

Re: Outlook

2006-06-26 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Jarkko Hietaniemi [2006-06-26 18:05]: > Robert G. Werner wrote: > > Don't get me started on Outlook. > > > > Who has ever heard of having two place in one file to store > > your fucking address book (and they really are two separate > > address books but they are live in one pile of shit called

Re: oops i just quit

2006-06-26 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 05:18:10PM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote: > > can someone please send steve a memo that having apple + q so close to > > apple +w makes it far too easy to quit something you didn't mean to? > > Surely someone's written a Haxie (err, APE plugin) to require CMD-Q CMD-Q > within

Re: tabs in source code

2006-06-26 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
David Cantrell wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:12:46AM -0400, Foofy wrote: > >> I just put each attribute on its own line. Easier to read and edit. >> > attr='blahblah' >> attr='blahblah' >> attr='blahblah' >> /> > > A, the language that has twice the brackets of Lisp with

Re: Outlook

2006-06-26 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Robert G. Werner wrote: > Guy Thornley wrote: > [snip] > >> Outlook hate deserves a whole hate-thread of its own, I'm sure :) Even from >> us types that don't use it, but occasionally attempt to communicate with >> those that do.. >> >> - Guy > Don't get me started on Outlook. > > Who has ever he

Re: Too many schedulers

2006-06-26 Thread demerphq
On 6/26/06, Kevin O'Rourke wrote: Peter da Silva wrote: > Heh. My first reaction was "why are you still running Windows 9x?" I'm not, it's Windows XP Pro. > Not that kind of scheduler. :) No, I meant the cron kind. Imagine if every bit of software you installed on a Unix/Linux system came with

Re: Too many schedulers

2006-06-26 Thread Kevin O'Rourke
Peter da Silva wrote: > Heh. My first reaction was "why are you still running Windows 9x?" I'm not, it's Windows XP Pro. > Not that kind of scheduler. :) No, I meant the cron kind. Imagine if every bit of software you installed on a Unix/Linux system came with its own special version of cron. Th