Aristotle Pagaltzis writes:
* Smylers smyl...@stripey.com [2008-10-10 19:40]:
\n denotes a 'new line', a virtual concept which is made up of some
concept of some combination of line feeds (\x0A) and carriage
returns, in an attempt to cope with the hateful different ways OSes
have
* Smylers smyl...@stripey.com [2008-10-17 09:50]:
Aristotle Pagaltzis writes:
That's actually totally wrong!
(Is being actually totally wrong different from just being
wrong?)
Yes: what you wrote was wrong on multiple levels and did not
incorporate any individually correct statements.
(Is being actually totally wrong different from just being
wrong?)
Yes: what you wrote was wrong on multiple levels and did not
incorporate any individually correct statements.
OK, fair enough!
It's a very misconception, though,
Yes. It's very.
The missing word was common,
* Smylers smyl...@stripey.com [2008-10-17 13:35]:
Did I miss something?
No, just that I when I read it, so I thought I'd highlight
it and perhaps make a few other people as well.
Cheers.
Hehe. By itself that would have worked, it’s just in combination
with the “totally wrong” quibble
This sort of shenanigans are possible in just about any language.
The hate here isn't Perl lets you load guns so people can shoot themselves
in the foot.
It's the bastards who wrote this code are setting someone's feet up the gun.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:43:20PM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote:
The hate here isn't Perl lets you load guns so people can shoot themselves
in the foot.
It's the bastards who wrote this code are setting someone's feet up the gun.
I see no hate. It's not like any sane person is ever going to
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:12:24 +0100, David Cantrell
da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:43:20PM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote:
The hate here isn't Perl lets you load guns so people can shoot themselves
in the foot.
It's the bastards who wrote this code are setting
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 02:12:24PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
[...]
I see no hate. It's not like any sane person is ever going to use
MoveableType and so get affected by it.
Anybody writing MT plugins is going to be doing use MT::RandomModule at
some point, although one could easily argue
Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2008-10-16 at 12:19 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Read Reflections on Trusting Trust by Ken Thompson as he goes about ways a
malicious author could hide a trojan horse in seemingly innocent code.
http://www.c-program.com/kt/reflections-on-trusting.html
Then reflect
* Simon Wistow si...@thegestalt.org [2008-10-16 22:00]:
Mmm, can you taste the *crunchiness* of 6 year old code?
In the case of the MT codebase, most assuredly.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
10 matches
Mail list logo
