On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 02:47:26PM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 14:32, James Laver wrote:
It's telling that at a large FTSE 250 we were hand constructing the xml
(with string concatenation, no less) to get around the shitty libraries
problem.
Funnily enough, that's what
On 29 Apr 2010, at 12:09, David Cantrell wrote:
[...]
Last time I had to use SOAP, the libraries in use at either end couldn't
handle some data structures we needed. The solution? CSV, uuencoded,
as a blob in SOAP.
Blimey, your SOAP implementations must have been bad if CSV was an
Peter Corlett ab...@cabal.org.uk writes:
On 29 Apr 2010, at 12:09, David Cantrell wrote:
[...]
Last time I had to use SOAP, the libraries in use at either end couldn't
handle some data structures we needed. The solution? CSV, uuencoded,
as a blob in SOAP.
Blimey, your SOAP implementations
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:53:16 +1000, Daniel Pittman
dan...@rimspace.net wrote:
Peter Corlett ab...@cabal.org.uk writes:
On 29 Apr 2010, at 12:09, David Cantrell wrote:
[...]
Last time I had to use SOAP, the libraries in use at either end couldn't
handle some data structures we needed.
What about the fact that everything in CSV is a STRING? That there is
no difference between an empty field and an undefined field and that
Microsoft (sorry, they keep fucking things up) Excel converts
everything that looks like a date to a US date, even if correctly
formatted as ISO, so
On 29 Apr 2010, at 13:53, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
[...]
See that we can deduce ALL hate to be blamable to Microsoft :)
Eventually we can find the relation between something going wrong or
counter-intuitive to be Microsoft's fault. I like that!
Is it also Microsoft's fault that you (and other
1. libtool
nuf said
2. GNU gcc
up to and including 3.4.6 you only needed GNU gcc source code to
build gcc. With a little bit of persistence, it would even be
possible to build gcc starting with another ANSI C-compiler, e.g.
HP-UX C-ANSI-C.
Now with gcc-4, it depends on GMP
2. GNU gcc
up to and including 3.4.6 you only needed GNU gcc source code to
build gcc. With a little bit of persistence, it would even be
possible to build gcc starting with another ANSI C-compiler, e.g.
HP-UX C-ANSI-C.
Now with gcc-4, it depends on GMP and MPFR
That already sucks
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:53:09AM -0400, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
2. GNU gcc
up to and including 3.4.6 you only needed GNU gcc source code to
build gcc. With a little bit of persistence, it would even be
possible to build gcc starting with another ANSI C-compiler, e.g.
HP-UX
On 2010.4.29 5:58 AM, Peter Corlett wrote:
On 29 Apr 2010, at 13:53, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
[...]
See that we can deduce ALL hate to be blamable to Microsoft :)
Eventually we can find the relation between something going wrong or
counter-intuitive to be Microsoft's fault. I like that!
Is it
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:59:55 +0100, Nicholas Clark n...@ccl4.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:53:09AM -0400, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
2. GNU gcc
up to and including 3.4.6 you only needed GNU gcc source code to
build gcc. With a little bit of persistence, it would even be
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43941
It's your own source, so I don't think I have to include it.
WORKING AS INTENDED. WILL NOT FIX. HTH.
--
There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is
'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 05:32:16PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:59:55 +0100, Nicholas Clark n...@ccl4.org
wrote:
And only with unclaimed preconditions:
ld: Unsatisfied symbol libiconv_open in file ../libcpp/libcpp.a[charset.o]
ld: Unsatisfied symbol libiconv_close
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:06:34 +, James Laver j...@jameslaver.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 05:32:16PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:59:55 +0100, Nicholas Clark n...@ccl4.org
wrote:
And only with unclaimed preconditions:
ld: Unsatisfied symbol
14 matches
Mail list logo
