On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Peter da Silva wrote:
> IDGI, they both look identical to me:
They do to me, too, now that your mailer has munged Nicholas's message as well.
Compare his original, though, where the top line of underscores looks different.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton
IDGI, they both look identical to me:
On 2010-09-18, at 07:21, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Compare:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:11:53PM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
>
>> _ _ ___
>> | _ \| | __ )| |/ / / \ / ___|
>> | |_) | _| | _ \| ' / / _ \| |
>> |
Compare:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:11:53PM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
> _ _ ___
> | _ \| | __ )| |/ / / \ / ___|
> | |_) | _| | _ \| ' / / _ \| |
> | __/| |___| |_) | . \ / ___ \ |___
> |_| |_|/|_|\_\/_/ \_\|
On Sat, Sep 18, 201
On Sep 18, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Peter Corlett wrote:
On 18 Sep 2010, at 11:45, Joshua Juran wrote:
I used to hate Apple Mail's inability to allow me to display
incoming messages in a fixed-width font (as needed to view ASCII
art) except by viewing the raw message (which only works as
intended
On 18 Sep 2010, at 11:45, Joshua Juran wrote:
I used to hate Apple Mail's inability to allow me to display incoming messages
in a fixed-width font (as needed to view ASCII art) except by viewing the raw
message (which only works as intended with text messages, but at least ASCII
art users tend
I used to hate Apple Mail's inability to allow me to display incoming
messages in a fixed-width font (as needed to view ASCII art) except by
viewing the raw message (which only works as intended with text
messages, but at least ASCII art users tend to send text).
That was with 10.4 "Tiger".