Oh jesus christ you sad bastards. Your preferred mouse/focus behaviour
are wrong, whatever it is. Audio-cocks all round!
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Joe Mahoney wrote:
> Audio-cocks all round!
Pre-emptive reply - of course that includes me
Joe
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> This is hates-software; worship-apple is over there. >
OK then.
If I click on a window I want it to raise up. If I simply put my mouse
over a window I want it do do nothing at all. Any other behaviour is
mindbogglingly annoying and
My java googles came loose when i dropped my laptop. Now I can hear
them rattling round in my bag when I walk to work.
Joe
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Yossi Kreinin
wrote:
> Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>>
>> http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/slc/1052576173.html
>>
>>
>
> "I accidentally del
, requiring a consistent interface and presentation
that stays the same from document to document.
Joe Mahoney
http://cheerschopper.com
Well I was replying to the email about os x specific software update.
In that case you have a simple, easy choice or updating or not. No
need to force quit, no need to be annoyed at having to force quit.
Why people even discuss windows updates on this list is beyond me. To
paraphrase a CSI charac
Here's an idea: let's put context back to software updates rather than
an analogy.
It's my experience the longer I leave a reboot after a
reboot-requiring update the more stability problems I have after the
reboot. It makes no logical sense but if you're on this list YOU KNOW
IT TO BE TRUE.
So th
> OS X Software Update doesn't even give you the option. You restart or... you
> restart. And the damn thing will keep bouncing in the dock until you do.
>
> Fortunately you can just Force Quit the application and that's that.
Why run the software update if you don't want to update?
Joe
On 3/16/07, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Its like putting a "self destruct" button on the right hand side of all the
tables in your house. Carelessly put a cup down in the wrong spot and *boop*!
Your table and cup disappear! And the best part is, there's no undo!
(something else Tab Mix Plus fix
Various theories and explanations here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/11/24/269237.aspx
Joe
On Nov 20, 2006, at 8:44 PM, Timothy Knox wrote:
After a few minutes, the installer pops up a dialog that
says, "You must quit X11.app before updating it. OK?" (or words to
that effect).
I clicked "OK", expecting the installer to either quit X11 for me,
or to stop
the install.
If I recal
I can't hear anything better than 128 mp3 but I don't have a problem
with lossless formats.
Joe
On 10/13/06, Bill Page wrote:
On 10/13/06, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> You're telling me that with a general-purpose CPU running at
> 1.5GHz, backed by a bus that's capable of pushing a few dozen (or
>
On 10/4/06, Smylers wrote:
> Why repeat? ... Select the files you want to change, hit Option-I, it
> asks are you sure you want to edit all those files at once, say yes
> and it'll let you set everything in bulk except the track name.
Um, in that case I'd guess the answer to your question is "b
On 10/4/06, Chris Devers wrote:
Provide hierarchy, metadata, and efficient search. For example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be_File_System
Can't argue with that. But until then, iTunes still wins.
Joe
On 10/4/06, Martin Ebourne wrote:
The filesystem is an entirely excellent way to organise music. So long
as it's all laid out consistently, which is the software's job.
(sound-juicer works well for me, sorry that was rather off topic).
If by "excellent" you mean "fundamentally crippled" I'd ag
15 matches
Mail list logo
