Zach White wrote at 08:06 on
2008-07-05:
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Joshua Juran wrote:
>
> It's worse than that. X11's selection buffer breaks a whole lot stuff
> if you, you know, actually use it and don't treat it like the vestigal
> feature it is.
>
> A common behavior that this mec
Abigail wrote at 15:18 on 2008-03-25:
>
> If you are revering to "high availability clusters" (such as HP Service
> guard, SUN Cluster, or Veritas Cluster), the answer is no. The cluster
> itself remains up, but if a node goes down, and a service is running on
> such a node, the service "switches
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote at 08:06 on 2008-03-25:
> Indeed. I've seen UNIX servers with 1+ year uptime, but sooner or later
> either a disk crash or a need to patch something urgent brings them down
> either by accident or by necessity. VMS takes uptime rather seriously.
> (I don't know for certa
Joshua Juran wrote at 00:53 on 2008-03-25:
> It's time we realized that Web applications are not hypertext
> documents, and actually created a system which was *designed* to
> deliver them. As long as we're forcing users to install extra
> software anyway, why bottleneck everything through
