Philip Newton wrote:
Ah. This is clearly some novel meaning of "open" standards process.
I think it's a sign that the SCO-style legal-FUD approach is working.
They appear to be so scared of anyone ever challenging the provenance of
any part of their work that even *talk to them* you need to s
Michael G Schwern wrote:
It's hateful enough to use a mailing list as your bug tracker, it's not
like any good bug tracker doesn't have a mail gateway, but it's extra
hateful when they don't accept posts from non-members so I need to sign
up to a bunch of mail I don't care one bit about JUST TO