On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:47:41PM -0400, num...@deathwyrm.com wrote:
> Jukka Ollila wrote:
> >Hmn. Did some earlier version of this fine piece of software by chance
> >only support v1 and v2whatever, at which point you had a boolean flag?
>
> If so, bet on there being bugs where some lazy coder
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:47:41PM -0400, num...@deathwyrm.com wrote:
> Jukka Ollila wrote:
>> Hmn. Did some earlier version of this fine piece of software by chance
>> only support v1 and v2whatever, at which point you had a boolean flag?
>
> If so, bet on there being bugs where some lazy coder
Jukka Ollila wrote:
Hmn. Did some earlier version of this fine piece of software by chance
only support v1 and v2whatever, at which point you had a boolean flag?
If so, bet on there being bugs where some lazy coder knowing it was
boolean wrote something like:
if (config->snmp.version) {
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Jonathan Katz wrote:
I find the following nicely hateful. At least it has an explanation of what
setting is what, although it isn't so intuitive...
# The snmp.version parameter controls the SNMP Version to use:
# 0 = Use SNMP Version 1
# 1 = Use SNMP Version 2
#
That's because they got it confused with USB...
# 2 = Use SNMP Version 2 Full Speed!
pe...@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
> That's because they got it confused with USB...
>
> # 2 = Use SNMP Version 2 Full Speed!
I thought the missing one was…
# 2 = Use SNMP Version 2c
--
ilmari
"A disappointingly low fraction of the human race is,
at any given time, on fire." -
I now work for a software company and since I'm new here I've been attending
training on our product. We're delving into one of the configuration files.
I find the following nicely hateful. At least it has an explanation of what
setting is what, although it isn't so intuitive...
# The snmp.version
