Re: [HCP-Users] Converting legacy data to CIFTI format

That doesn’t sound like you solved the alignment problem (it will still be misaligned in the volume) and I wouldn’t expect specifying the T2w as the T1w will work without some pipeline modifications. Matt. From: Kelli Cannon > Date: Thursday,

Re: [HCP-Users] Pulse Ox - PULS.log

Hi Greg/all, It turns out the "bad" PULS.log time stamps are off by 24 hours. Subtracting 24 hours worth of ticks from the time stamps solves the problem for those runs. Andrew On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Burgess, Gregory wrote: > We have not had enough experience with

Re: [HCP-Users] MELODIC denoising vs. released ICA-FIX datasets

Steve, Have you found an obvious downside to a shorter HPF cutoff of, say, 200 seconds? Would the HCP FIX training data still apply or would the classifier need to be retrained? -Keith On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Xu, Junqian wrote: > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 9:03 PM,

Re: [HCP-Users] Pulse Ox - PULS.log

We have not had enough experience with these yet. You may want to check the CMRR MB support page, or post an issue https://github.com/CMRR-C2P/MB/issues --Greg Greg Burgess, Ph.D. Staff Scientist, Human Connectome Project

Re: [HCP-Users] MELODIC denoising vs. released ICA-FIX datasets

> On Oct 4, 2016, at 9:03 PM, Ely, Benjamin wrote: > > Thanks Steve, that's good to keep in mind. Our acquisition is a single > "HCP-like" 15 minute run at MB6, 2.1mm isotropic resolution, TR=1s, AP phase > encoding, 32-channel head coil on a 3T Skyra; hopefully that

Re: [HCP-Users] MELODIC denoising vs. released ICA-FIX datasets

> On Oct 4, 2016, at 9:03 PM, Ely, Benjamin wrote: > > Thanks Steve, that's good to keep in mind. Our acquisition is a single > "HCP-like" 15 minute run at MB6, 2.1mm isotropic resolution, TR=1s, AP phase > encoding, 32-channel head coil on a 3T Skyra; hopefully that

Re: [HCP-Users] Pulse Ox - PULS.log

Hi Greg, Thanks for your reply, I was not aware of the 'readCMRRPhysio.m' function or that repo. That code is similar to mine, and I'm glad to see that the ACQ_START_TICS are indeed 2.5 ms / tic. My first concern was that I was misinterpreting the time stamp values. The issue is that the

Re: [HCP-Users] Pulse Ox - PULS.log

I haven’t had a chance to look at those new files, so I’d be interested to hear more about your experience. If you’re not familiar with it, you should check out https://github.com/CMRR-C2P/MB/blob/master/readCMRRPhysio.m . One thing to note, at least with the legacy files, the time stamp in