Hi Michael - I think Joelle is asking about tractography instead of func conn.
I expect it will be some time before fuller sets of tractography analyses have
been done.
Cheers.
> On 2 May 2017, at 01:17, Harms, Michael wrote:
>
>
> Well, there’s the canonical correlation analysis of rfMRI n
Well, there’s the canonical correlation analysis of rfMRI network edges vs.
subject measures in:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26414616
cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
cool thank you. The MegaTrawl was done on the FC - subject measures only
right? Is there any such analysis coming up for SC - subject measures?
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Harms, Michael wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Have you read the documentation for the MegaTrawl?
>
> cheers,
> -MH
>
> --
> Michael H
Thanks for your advice, I redo cp tfMRI_EMOTION_hp200_s4_level2.fsf file twice,
then it works now, I'm not sure whether it would crash again or not.
Best,
Bai Haohao
-- --
??: "Harms, Michael";;
: 2017??4??29??(??) 10:23
??:
Yes we hope to do this in the future. tfMRI runs are shorter than rfMRI runs,
however, so some new code needed to be written to combine across runs for
denoising and then split the data back out.
Peace,
Matt.
From:
mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
on behalf of Irisqql0922 mail
Dear HCP teams,
I notice that you have run CIA-FIX denoise process for rfMRI data, but it
seems like there is no such process for task fMRI.
Now I am working on WM data and want to find related SNR data to do some
further analyse. So I wonder if there is any file containing SNR value
(verte
