Re: [HCP-Users] Motor task contrats: no RH-cue, LH-cue, etc.?

2017-02-09 Thread Burgess, Gregory
_ > From: Burgess, Gregory [gburg...@wustl.edu] > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 5:18 PM > To: Xavier Guell Paradis > Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org > Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Motor task contrats: no RH-cue, LH-cue, etc.? > > I thought that contrasti

Re: [HCP-Users] Motor task contrats: no RH-cue, LH-cue, etc.?

2017-02-07 Thread Xavier Guell Paradis
MINUSCUE.dscalar.nii Thank you very much, Xavier. From: Burgess, Gregory [gburg...@wustl.edu] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 5:18 PM To: Xavier Guell Paradis Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Motor task contrats: no RH-cue, LH-c

Re: [HCP-Users] Motor task contrats: no RH-cue, LH-cue, etc.?

2017-02-06 Thread Burgess, Gregory
I thought that contrasting each effector against the average of the others (e.g., RH-AVG) was a more-effective control to isolate motor-specific regions. If you are still interested in contrasting each effector versus the cue (controlling for visual activation without controlling for other