+1 to close it out.
With 6 +1 votes (5 binding) this passes.
Thanks everyone, particularly Sean and Inigo for trying it out. We'll
merge this soon. -C
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Discussion thread: https://s.apache.org/kxT1
>
> We're down to the last few issues and ar
--发件人：Iñigo
Goiri 发送时间：2017年12月14日(星期四) 09:29收件人：Sean Mackrory
抄 送：Anu Engineer ; Virajith
Jalaparti ; Chris Douglas ;
hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org ; viraj...@apache.org
; ehi...@apache.org ;
thdem...@apache.org 主 题：Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-9806 to trunk
+1
I have been reviewing
+1
I have been reviewing some of the latest patches.
I skimmed through the patch in HDFS-9806 and it looks good.
In addition, we have ported it to 2.7.1 (minor differences to what would be
merged).
It has been running in our test cluster for a couple months.
All the issues we have been finding are
+1 from me. There are some unrelated errors building the branch right now
due to annotations in some YARN code, etc. but I was able to generate an fs
image from an S3 bucket and serve the content through HDFS on a
pseudo-distributed HDFS node this morning. Seems like a good point for a
merge.
On W
Hi Virajith / Chris/ Thomas / Ewan,
Thanks for developing this feature and getting to merge state.
I would like to vote +1 for this merge. Thanks for all the hard work.
Thanks
Anu
On 12/8/17, 7:11 PM, "Virajith Jalaparti" wrote:
Hi,
We have tested the HDFS-9806 branch in two set
Hi,
We have tested the HDFS-9806 branch in two settings:
(i) 26 node bare-metal cluster, with PROVIDED storage configured to point
to another instance of HDFS (containing 468 files, total of ~400GB of
data). Half of the Datanodes are configured with only DISK volumes and
other other half have bot
Discussion thread: https://s.apache.org/kxT1
We're down to the last few issues and are preparing the branch to
merge to trunk. We'll post merge patches to HDFS-9806 [1]. Minor,
"cleanup" tasks (checkstyle, findbugs, naming, etc.) will be tracked
in HDFS-12712 [2].
We've tried to ensure that when
