[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1174) New properties for suspend and resume process.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinay Kumar Thota updated HDFS-1174: Summary: New properties for suspend and resume process. (was: New properties for supend

[jira] Created: (HDFS-1174) New properties for supend and resume process.

New properties for supend and resume process. - Key: HDFS-1174 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1174 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Task Components: test

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1174) New properties for suspend and resume process.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinay Kumar Thota updated HDFS-1174: Attachment: HDFS-1174.patch Initial patch. New properties for suspend and resume process.

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-599) Improve Namenode robustness by prioritizing datanode heartbeats over client requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HDFS-599: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Sounds reasonable to implement Sanjay's proposal. Improve

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1071) savenamespace should write the fsimage to all configured fs.name.dir in parallel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871257#action_12871257 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1071: +1. code looks good to me. I wil commit

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1172) Blocks in newly completed files are considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871258#action_12871258 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1172: Can this be achieved by setting

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1172) Blocks in newly completed files are considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871283#action_12871283 ] Scott Carey commented on HDFS-1172: --- I run with min replication = 2, yet see this all the

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871285#action_12871285 ] sam rash commented on HDFS-1057: @hairong: I'm looking a little at implementing this in

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1172) Blocks in newly completed files are considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871287#action_12871287 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1172: --- I think there are a few solutions to this: -

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871288#action_12871288 ] sam rash commented on HDFS-1057: hmm, in looking at the code more, I see that this depends

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1044) Cannot submit mapreduce job from secure client to unsecure sever

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871329#action_12871329 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-1044: -- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #346 (See

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1172) Blocks in newly completed files are considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871353#action_12871353 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1172: UnderReplicatedBlocks could be augmented

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1172) Blocks in newly completed files are considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871359#action_12871359 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1172: --- Ah, very clever, Dhruba! I like that idea. Blocks

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1119) Refactor BlocksMap with GettableSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HDFS-1119: - Attachment: h1119_20100525.patch Thanks Konstantin for the comments.

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1119) Refactor BlocksMap with GettableSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HDFS-1119: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1172) Blocks in newly completed files are considered under-replicated too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871385#action_12871385 ] Scott Carey commented on HDFS-1172: --- bq. # Scott's solution of making the primary DN send

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1114) Reducing NameNode memory usage by an alternate hash table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HDFS-1114: - Attachment: GSet20100525.pdf GSet20100525.pdf: a design doc. Reducing NameNode

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1142) Lease recovery doesn't reassign lease when triggered by append()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871407#action_12871407 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-1142: --- Sam. Sounds like you are looking at

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1142) Lease recovery doesn't reassign lease when triggered by append()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871416#action_12871416 ] sam rash commented on HDFS-1142: Hi Konstantin, Sorry, I am basing this mostly on the 0.20

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-599) Improve Namenode robustness by prioritizing datanode heartbeats over client requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871430#action_12871430 ] Eli Collins commented on HDFS-599: -- bq. I suggest a separate jira to extend the Service ACL

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1142) Lease recovery doesn't reassign lease when triggered by append()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871432#action_12871432 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-1142: --- Thanks. Yes with 0.20 that would be a

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1119) Refactor BlocksMap with GettableSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871436#action_12871436 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1119: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1119) Refactor BlocksMap with GettableSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871439#action_12871439 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HDFS-1119: -- Since this is a code

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1132) Refactor TestFileStatus

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HDFS-1132: - Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1134) Large-scale Automated Framework

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HDFS-1134: - Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 (was: 0.22.0) Large-scale Automated

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-992) Re-factor block access token implementation to conform to the generic Token interface in Common

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HDFS-992: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Triggering Hudson Re-factor block access token implementation to

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1134) Large-scale Automated Framework

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HDFS-1134: - Attachment: HDFS-1134.patch Re-fitting the patch to be applicable after HDFS-1159.

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1134) Large-scale Automated Framework

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HDFS-1134: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) HADOOP-6771 has been committed and now Herrior

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-992) Re-factor block access token implementation to conform to the generic Token interface in Common

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871450#action_12871450 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-992: -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-992) Re-factor block access token implementation to conform to the generic Token interface in Common

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HDFS-992: - Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 pending test-patch results. This really should have been split into two

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1132) Refactor TestFileStatus

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871465#action_12871465 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-1132: -- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #282 (See

[jira] Created: (HDFS-1175) HAR files used for RAID parity need to have configurable partfile size

HAR files used for RAID parity need to have configurable partfile size -- Key: HDFS-1175 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1175 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1175) HAR files used for RAID parity need to have configurable partfile size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HDFS-1175: -- Attachment: HDFS-1175.patch HAR files used for RAID parity need to have configurable partfile

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1175) HAR files used for RAID parity need to have configurable partfile size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HDFS-1175: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) HAR files used for RAID parity need to have configurable

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1175) HAR files used for RAID parity need to have configurable partfile size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871476#action_12871476 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1175: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1134) Large-scale Automated Framework

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871485#action_12871485 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1134: - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest

[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1057) Concurrent readers hit ChecksumExceptions if following a writer to very end of file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12871497#action_12871497 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HDFS-1057: - Sam, the replica length in my comment meant the

[jira] Updated: (HDFS-1175) HAR files used for RAID parity need to have configurable partfile size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HDFS-1175: --- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Resolution: Invalid HAR is part of the