Aha, that works.
Any ideas what kind of throughput I can expect, or suggestions for making this
run as fast as possible? Obviously exact numbers will depend on cluster
config, I won't bore you with the details, but... 10mbit? 100mbit? A gigabit?
I've got about 112TB of data to move from the
Errr really? Well shipping a bunch of hard drives should be faster.
J-D
On Apr 23, 2011 12:17 AM, Jonathan Disher jdis...@parad.net wrote:
Aha, that works.
Any ideas what kind of throughput I can expect, or suggestions for making
this run as fast as possible? Obviously exact numbers will
This is an interesting question. AvatarNode doesn't use Zookeeper?
Is there a drawback to implementing ZK for the NameNode other than the
potential bugs from a newly engineered feature?
Perhaps this issue is the main one for implementing the NameNode in
ZK? HDFS-1623
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at
The AvatarNode does use zookeeper (but since this is not directly related to
Apache HDFS code, if u have more questions, please send it to me directly).
The latest AvatarNode code is in
Will the avatar node be part of 0.22?
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Dhruba Borthakur dhr...@gmail.com wrote:
The AvatarNode does use zookeeper (but since this is not directly related to
Apache HDFS code, if u have more questions, please send it to me directly).
The latest AvatarNode code
