; 0.21, which is buggy in other aspects. So, no stable released version
>>> has a working append() call.
>>>
>>> In truth I've never seen a _good_ use case for
>>> append-to-an-existing-file. Usually you can do just as well by keeping
>>> the file
no bug ?
>>
>> 0.21, which is buggy in other aspects. So, no stable released version
>> has a working append() call.
>>
>> In truth I've never seen a _good_ use case for
>> append-to-an-existing-file. Usually you can do just as well by keeping
>> the
. Usually you can do just as well by keeping
> the file open and periodically hflushing, or rolling to a new file
> when you want to add more records to an existing dataset.
>
> -Todd
>
>>> From: t...@cloudera.com
>>> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:17:10 -0700
>>&g
ting-file. Usually you can do just as well by keeping
the file open and periodically hflushing, or rolling to a new file
when you want to add more records to an existing dataset.
-Todd
>> From: t...@cloudera.com
>> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:17:10 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Question about hd
bug ?
4 which version of hdfs that append is no bug ?
thanks again.kanghua
> From: t...@cloudera.com
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:17:10 -0700
> Subject: Re: Question about hdfs close * hflush behavior
> To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.orgSend
>
> 2011/9/7 kang hua :
> >
> &
2011/9/7 kang hua :
>
> Hi friends:
>I has two question.
>first one is:
>I use libhdfs's hflush to flush my data to a file, in same process
> context I can read it. But I find that file unchanged if I check from hadoop
> shell it's len is zero( check by "hadoop fs -ls xxx" or read
Hi friends: I has two question. first one is: I use libhdfs's hflush to
flush my data to a file, in same process context I can read it. But I find that
file unchanged if I check from hadoop shell ―― it's len is zero( check by
"hadoop fs -ls xxx" or read it in program); however when I reb
