Daniel,
The wording regarding the non-roman script issues appropriately addresses
concerns to our specialized library/research community, which have not been
raised previously.
Thanks for sharing this latest draft.
Lenore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/07/06 11:33 AM
Lenore,
I'm convinced now
You're welcome, Lenore.
Looking forward to seeing you in Cambridge.
Daniel
At 09:42 AM 6/9/2006, Lenore Bell wrote:
Daniel,
The wording regarding the non-roman script issues appropriately addresses
concerns to our specialized library/research community, which have not
been raised
Daniel,
Thanks for sharing your revised draft and for incorporating the feedback you
received.
I very much agree that the Casalini issue should not be mentioned. The
developments related to contract negotations with a commerical vendor differ
greatly from the type of policy making which
Lenore,
I'm convinced now too. Thanks for reinforcing Caroline's point.
Also, as suggested by Caroline, I've added some language about AJL and
Non-Roman script-specific concerns (see revised draft below). I tried
including a specific example, but found it was too hard to represent
Dear colleagues,
I've made some changes to the draft based on your very thoughtful comments
and suggestions.
Before this kind of letter can be sent, the AJL Council would need to agree
with its contents and sign off on it. Considering that we're in the midst
of Shavuot, and many AJL members
