Re: [Heb-NACO] Date of publication based on the destruction of the Temple

2023-07-21 Thread Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco
Yossi, I didn’t see anywhere that the publication in question was specifically by Ben Yehudah, so I gave a broader response. Sorry if I missed something. P.S. As cataloging moves to more inclusive conventions and terminology, BC and AD are being phased out in favor of BCE and CE, respectively. _

Re: [Heb-NACO] Date of publication based on the destruction of the Temple

2023-07-21 Thread Galron, Joseph via Heb-naco
Jasmin, Thank you for your message. The question is not when the Temple was destroyed, 68, 69 or 70 A.D. The question is what year did Ben Yehudah and his publications think that the Temple was destroyed and according to that year calculated the date on the published book or newspaper. According

Re: [Heb-NACO] Date of publication based on the destruction of the Temple

2023-07-21 Thread Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco
There seems to be a stray space in my date range below; it should read [that is, between 1902-1905]. Also, the descriptive note can be more succinct, “Publication date is counted from the destruction of the Second Temple which occurred between 68-70 CE.” From: Heb-naco On Behalf Of Shinohara,

Re: [Heb-NACO] Date of publication based on the destruction of the Temple

2023-07-21 Thread Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco
Hi, I think Robert meant that 1849 was 1916/1917 per the linked article Yossi had sent. 1849-1836 (the date in Yossi’s publication) is a difference of 13 years; 1916/1917-13 = 1903/1904. However, I’m not sure about Ben-Yehudah’s use of the date 69 CE as the year of the destruction of Bayit Sheni