[Heb-NACO] FW: 2023 1st quarter Legal Cataloging Forum this Wednesday (K vs B vs KB)

2023-01-06 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
Dear colleagues, The webinar next Wednesday is an expansion of one I gave some time ago to AJL members. This covers all religions, not just the BM vs KBM divide. Feel free to forward this to anyone who might be interested. -Aaron Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section This is not an off

Re: [Heb-NACO] British Chief Rabbinate

2022-11-03 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
The cataloger who proposed the more recent heading (“British Chief Rabbinate”) should have included documentation supporting the idea that the “Office of the Chief Rabbi of Great Britain” I other than the “British Chief Rabbinate”, or alternatively, that the preferred name has changed. While I

Re: [Heb-NACO] [EXT] - Cataloging Form - inaugural roundtable

2021-06-29 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
The LC Law Section has been sponsoring quarterly for the last few years. The biggest problems involve getting sufficient non-LC speakers (and getting speakers in general). -Aaron Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section. This is not an official communication from my employer From: Heb-naco

Re: [Heb-NACO] Sacred work

2021-01-26 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
I believe the cataloging powers the be are moving in the direction of avoiding “special” rules when general ones will work. I would argue that except for Humash from a traditional (i.e. Orthodox/Hareidi) perspective, there are no “sacred” works in the Jewish tradition, but only works with ascri

Re: [Heb-NACO] Sacred work

2021-01-26 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
Mysticism is a subject concept. From a descriptive perspective, a work would be mystical only if it was flickering in and out of existence, e.g. was on a server in a parallel universe that occasionally was visible in our universe. Whether the multiverse is a halachic concept is not for us to wo

Re: [Heb-NACO] How would your Romanize the following word

2019-06-13 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
It is interesting that it appears that Hebrew-speakers with that name tend to Romanize it, and apparently pronounce it, as it is pronounced in western language, meaning the first letter is a “J”. We really should be asking what value it is to have a rule that requires making a Romanization tha

Re: [Heb-NACO] פלסטינים

2019-05-17 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
lto:heb-naco@lists.osu.edu>> wrote: and what about פלשתינאים? Is it also with an F? Yossi On Fri, May 17, 2019, 08:22 Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco mailto:heb-naco@lists.osu.edu>> wrote: Do users actually say that? I don’t recall Hebrew speakers pronouncing that initial letter as othe

Re: [Heb-NACO] פלסטינים

2019-05-17 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
Do users actually say that? I don’t recall Hebrew speakers pronouncing that initial letter as other than a “P”? Aaron Kuperman, LC Law Cataloging Section. This is not an official communication from my employer From: Heb-naco On Behalf Of Shinohara, Jasmin via Heb-naco Sent: Thursday, May 16

Re: [Heb-NACO] geo. subdivision for Eruv

2019-03-01 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
But “Eruv” is clearly a “Jewish law” heading, so a book “Eruv--Jerusalem” would be on the halachic problems of building an eruv there as opposed to New York (e.g. building an eruv in a walled city, building an eruv in a city with over 60 Jews, etc.). This gets you into two issues. First, “J

Re: [Heb-NACO] geo. subdivision for Eruv

2019-03-01 Thread Kuperman, Aaron via Heb-naco
What is the book? Would an individual eruv, e.g. the Baltimore eruv, be a 110 or a 151, rather than a 150. In the authority file? Thinking of Baltimore, the Baltimore eruv would probably be a corporate body (it has officers, publishes a guide book, etc.), and the Baltimore eruv directory would