On 19 Aug 2006, at 00:35, Satya wrote:
I was reading the original paper about Bison - "Static Semantics and
Compiler Error Recovery" by Robert Paul Corbett, and it says
Bison's table
organization is based on a technique proposed by Ziegler and
described in
Tarjan and Yao in [TY78] ("Storing
hi,
I was reading the original paper about Bison - "Static Semantics and
Compiler Error Recovery" by Robert Paul Corbett, and it says Bison's table
organization is based on a technique proposed by Ziegler and described in
Tarjan and Yao in [TY78] ("Storing a Sparse Table");
My question is this: d
On 18 Aug 2006, at 12:12, Erik Sandberg wrote:
My idea was to check dynamically whether 0 or 1 lookahead tokens
has been
read, and take different actions depending on this (either queue a
token in
the lexer, or manipulate the current lookahead token). Would this
fail?
The parser must know
On Friday 18 August 2006 09:24, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2006, at 08:51, Erik Sandberg wrote:
>
> There is, in general, no good way to insert a token, as the LALR(1)
> algorithm that Bison uses to create the parser may or may not need a
> lookahead token in each parsing position (i.e., a set o
***ATTENTION ALL DAY TRADEERS AND INVESTOORS***
INVESTOOR ALEERT! DON'T MISS ANOTHER RUN OON IVH N!!!
BREAKING NEWS C
On 17 Aug 2006, at 08:51, Erik Sandberg wrote:
2. When a function argument has been shifted, the parser
artificially inserts
a special token as the next token. The token is a COMMA or SEMICOLON
depending on whether the shifted argument was the last argument.
...
A problem in (2) is _how_ to i
