Le 5 juin 2013 à 00:06, Adam Smalin a écrit :
> During my test to get << a difference precedence then < I suspect it is
> impossible because after expr < expr [<] it has no idea if it will be a <<
> expr or an < expression thus I can't tell it to have a different precedence
> between < and < <.
The problem with making >> one token is the problem C++ templates has with
`map>`. I know it can be changed to be something like D
which i think is map!(int, list!(int)) but I'd like to have the option of
doing it in C++ which i may not take.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Valentin Tolmer wrote:
During my test to get << a difference precedence then < I suspect it is
impossible because after expr < expr [<] it has no idea if it will be a <<
expr or an < expression thus I can't tell it to have a different precedence
between < and < <.
Because I can't I wrote this test grammar. When I execu
I put the below in my main project just to test it out so I don't have a
self contained source but the below should explain everything.
>From my understanding since '.' is more important then DOLLAR it will win.
Precedence is chosen the order nonassoc/left/right where the first seen is
least impor
Le 4 juin 2013 à 11:04, Adam Smalin a écrit :
> Nevermind I figured that out
Great!
Please, do try to make small self-contained examples when you
can.
___
help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
Nevermind I figured that out
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Adam Smalin wrote:
> Could you give me a better example? I tried the below and neither helped.
> I got the error
>
> Ambiguity detected.
> Option 1,
> mainLoop ->
> mainLoop ->
> mainLoop ->
> mainLoop
>
