Re: problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-13 Thread Alfonso Urdaneta
Volker Wegert wrote: I prefer Qt to STL - not only because I know it better, but also because of the documentation. I haven't found an adequate documentation for STL yet, sorry :-) http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/table_of_contents.html thats the one I use. -- alfonso e. urdaneta www.red82.com - are you

Re: problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-13 Thread Alfonso Urdaneta
Volker Wegert wrote: Alfonso Urdaneta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Works without problems, now :-) Do you know why, or don't really care once it works ? I don't know why, and yes, I'd like to know. :-) Thanks in advance Volker C++ allows you to create functions with the same name and different a

Re: problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-12 Thread Laurence Finston
> I prefer Qt to STL - not only because I know it better, but also because of > the documentation. I haven't found an adequate documentation for STL yet, > sorry :-) I suggested using STL strings and lists because you said you were having problems. To my way of thinking, Stroustrup's _The C++ Pr

Re: problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-12 Thread Volker Wegert
Laurence Finston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm currently trying to gain some experience with flex and bison. > I've found that I prefer using Flex and Bison separately rather than > together. If you're just starting out learning Bison, I think you > might find it easier to write your own `yyl

Re: problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-11 Thread Laurence Finston
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Frank Heckenbach wrote: > Laurence Finston wrote: > > > I've found that I prefer using Flex and Bison separately rather than > > together. If you're just starting out learning Bison, I think you > > might find it easier to write your own `yylex()' function rather than > > usi

Re: problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-11 Thread Frank Heckenbach
Laurence Finston wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Volker Wegert wrote: > > > I'm currently trying to gain some experience with flex and bison. > > I've found that I prefer using Flex and Bison separately rather than > together. If you're just starting out learning Bison, I think you > might find i

Re: problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-11 Thread Laurence Finston
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Volker Wegert wrote: > I'm currently trying to gain some experience with flex and bison. I've found that I prefer using Flex and Bison separately rather than together. If you're just starting out learning Bison, I think you might find it easier to write your own `yylex()' fu

Re: problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-10 Thread Alfonso Urdaneta
Volker Wegert wrote: However, I get the following error message during linking (output abbreviated): Stupid question, but I assume that you are aware of the name mangling in C++ and are properly externing your declarations to compensate ? -- alfonso e. urdaneta www.red82.com - are you ready ? ___

problem linking program containing bison-generated parser

2005-03-10 Thread Volker Wegert
Hello, I'm currently trying to gain some experience with flex and bison. In one of my projects, I'd like to use these two tools together with some Qt classes. I'm not trying to create an object-oriented parser, I'm just using Qt's string and list objects as I'm much more familiar with them. The i