> Le 30 déc. 2014 à 16:16, Sean Nakasone a écrit :
>
> i wasnt reading the code thoroughly... i apologize.
>
> how do run the test suite?
make check
___
help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
BOL (sp, i) - ntokens]++;
>> from_state[k] = s;
>> to_state[k] = sp->states[i]->number;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> free (temp_map);
>>
>>
>>
>> I appreciate your efforts and follow up.
>>
>>
>>
>
number k = temp_map[TRANSITION_SYMBOL (sp, i) - ntokens]++;
> from_state[k] = s;
> to_state[k] = sp->states[i]->number;
>}
>}
>
> free (temp_map);
>
>
>
> I appreciate your efforts and follow up.
>
>
>
>
oops! you're right. sorry for the trouble.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 29, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
>
>
>>> On 29 Dec 2014, at 22:40, sean nakasone wrote:
>>
>> The placement of the ++ makes it a post increment, so it's incremented after
>> the statement, so it should not af
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 22:40, sean nakasone wrote:
> The placement of the ++ makes it a post increment, so it's incremented after
> the statement, so it should not affect the value of k.
>
> It's incrementing values in temp_map, but temp_map is deallocated after the
> for loop, so that's why I
--
On Mon, 12/29/14, Akim Demaille wrote:
Subject: Re: set_goto_map() has unintentional ++ operator
To: "Sean Nakasone"
Cc: "Bison Help"
Date: Monday, December 29, 2014, 5:29 AM
> Le
21 déc. 2014 à 21:51, Sean Nakasone
a écrit :
>
> in
lalr.c
>
> Le 21 déc. 2014 à 21:51, Sean Nakasone a écrit :
>
> in lalr.c
>
> the ++ at the end of the following line doesn't have a purpose
>
> goto_number k = temp_map[TRANSITION_SYMBOL(sp, i) - ntokens]++;
>
> it can be misleading.
hi Sean,
Well, this piece of code is old, and it does not seem i
in lalr.c
the ++ at the end of the following line doesn't have a purpose
goto_number k = temp_map[TRANSITION_SYMBOL(sp, i) - ntokens]++;
it can be misleading.
Sent from my iPhone
___
help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bis
