--- Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the idea behing tarfs, can anyone explain
> the same?
>
> Transparent access to a tar archive.
> Example: settrans foo tarfs foo.tar
>
> And then you should be able to access the content of
> foo.tar under
> foo, just like if it has been
Chiaki Ishikawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Does anyone who has access to the mailman configuration for this
>mailing list (and other at fsf/gnu site)
>read this discussion?
Not directly.
> 2. If not, does anyone know how to contact and ask such person(s)
>to change the mailma
I am curious about two things. I don't need moderator(s).
1. Does anyone who has access to the mailman configuration for this
mailing list (and other at fsf/gnu site)
read this discussion?
(Not at least for the initial few hours of discussion, I
gather.)
2. If not, does anyone kn
Ottavio Campana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone explain me where this limitation is?
The problem is that ext2fs memory maps the whole partition at once.
Since the virtual memory address space is limited, mapping of
partition > 1GB becomes problematic.
moritz
--
[EMAIL
--- kurian kattukaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi to all,
> where can i find gcc, gdb etc for the hurd.
> The debian ftp site dosent show them.
>
Sure the debian ftp does. However, all GNU/Hurd packages are in
pool.
I don't think GNU/Hurd packages are shown in any dists, if that
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:26:56PM +0100, Stefan Karrmann wrote:
> Make the non-subscriber mails go to some moderators and send the
> subscriber mails directly to the list.
>
I hate that, it's bureaucratic. I just said something similar in
another mail which I regret now.
I do agree though if
Hi,
Edit the file /etc/apt/sources.list and add the lines
deb ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd/debian unstable main
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable main
After, just use apt-get.
Bruno Costa
Em Quinta 20 Dezembro 2001 15:51, you wrote:
> hi to all,
> where can i find gcc, gdb e
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 06:23:20PM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> If you just use procmail you don't find any solution to all the spam
> emails that travel with this mailing list. Everyone has first to
> download the mails and then to kill them. Wouldn't it be easier and more
> effici
Make the non-subscriber mails go to some moderators and send the
subscriber mails directly to the list.
--
Stefan Karrmann
Satire does not look pretty upon a tombstone.
___
Help-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinf
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:43:12 +0100
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have spent more time in my life reading (and sometimes participating) in
> discussions about spam on mailing lists than I spent deleting the spam :)
>
Good point. :)
Being more or less a 'calm lurker' on this li
On 20011220T182320+0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier and more
> efficient to stop them directly at the source?
Yes. However, /dev/nulling them at the list robot does not do that.
Only complaining about spam does that - and for that you need to get
a copy of it.
--
Antti-Juha
hi to all,
where can i find gcc, gdb etc for the hurd.
The debian ftp site dosent show them.
kurian kattukaren
"The spirit of the community is sharing"
___
Help-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:20:56AM +0100, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> Personally, I think this is all absolutely silly: first off, an
> X-RBL-Warning header is added to all mail coming from gnu.org lists
> that are sent from an open relay. I send all of this mail directly to
> /dev/null. I also rej
hi,
i'm interested in trying out the httpfs / tarfs.
Can anyone give me an idea about the httpfs?
How httpfs should work?
I have a stand-alone PC here, so i think i have to
configure a web server for doing httpfs, isn't it?
Is apache available for Hurd?
What is the idea behing tarfs, can an
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:53:46AM -0200, Bruno A. C. Ferreira wrote:
> I think much of this spam comes from non members. So, a primary action to
> avoid spam should be to enable the option "member_posting_only" (This list is
> managed by Mailman, right?).
This is a help channel. I don't want
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 15:38, Michele Dalla Silvestra wrote:
> Moderators can be more than one person, and is very simple to manage. With 3
> or 4 moderators, some unlucky messages can be a delay minor than 24 h.
But that's a long delay for a discussion list. Blocking mail with
implicit destinatio
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:53:46AM -0200, Bruno A. C. Ferreira wrote:
> I think much of this spam comes from non members. So, a primary action to
> avoid spam should be to enable the option "member_posting_only" (This list is
> managed by Mailman, right?).
Apart from using procmail in every cl
Leo Korinth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have had an idea of a freenet translator for a long time.
[...]
> My idea is that you would use the translator like the ftp translator
> except when you cd to a directory you get the directory full of files
> that matches the "search".
I actually had the
Ottavio Campana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to understand why hurd doesn't support larger partitions than 2
> gb.
More like 1 gigabyte.
> Is the problem in gnumach? Is it in the ext2 translator?
The ext2fs.
> Can someone explain me where this limitation is?
Limited virtual memory;
X-PMC-CI-e-mail-id: 17323
>However, setting mailman to require explicit recipients is a Good
>Thing - there is no problem with this: The ML is public anyway and a
>Bcc to the list is therefore silly. Most spam gets filtered our with
>this rule.
So who is going to perform this modification?
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:20:56 +0100, Neal H Walfield said:
> Personally, I think this is all absolutely silly: first off, an
> X-RBL-Warning header is added to all mail coming from gnu.org lists
This works perfectly. The uk-crypto ML uses the same, well I have to
allow a few poster which are som
I think much of this spam comes from non members. So, a primary action to
avoid spam should be to enable the option "member_posting_only" (This list is
managed by Mailman, right?).
But if this option is already enabled (and the spammers are the members), I
agree that this list should be moder
I'd like to understand why hurd doesn't support larger partitions than 2
gb.
Is the problem in gnumach? Is it in the ext2 translator?
Can someone explain me where this limitation is?
--
Non c'e' piu' forza nella normalia'à, c'e' solo monotonia.
___
> > I subscribe to this list. I'm getting a bit exasperated by the large
>> amount of spam which occurs.
>>
>> Can the list be moderated? If no one else is willing, I'd be willing
>> to volunteer, if it were possible for me to act as moderator.
>
> You're right! I think that the list should be mo
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:34:16PM +, Bob Wilkinson wrote:
> I subscribe to this list. I'm getting a bit exasperated by the large
> amount of spam which occurs.
>
> Can the list be moderated? If no one else is willing, I'd be willing
> to volunteer, if it were possible for me to act as modera
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 00:34, Bob Wilkinson wrote:
> Can the list be moderated? If no one else is willing, I'd be willing
> to volunteer, if it were possible for me to act as moderator.
Most of the spam has implicit destination, and this list is powered by
mailman, which has a feature to reject th
26 matches
Mail list logo
