Re: creating a segfault in a translator (on purpose)

2003-02-05 Thread Richard Kreuter
7;crash --dump-core' then? I'm looking at native-install from gnu-20020816. -- Richard ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd

Re: Inheritance of "/", auth and proc handles

2002-12-20 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:17:57PM +0100, Ludovic Court?s wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:04:57AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > BTW, what's the reason for the poem that is just above file_chauthor in > fs.defs? :) To make hackers groan.

Re: installation error

2002-10-06 Thread Richard Kreuter
t single-user and run native-install twice after unpacking the files. This is documented in Mr. Walfield's installation guide. I don't remember exactly what gets done during the first run, but I believe the second run initializes the dpkg databases and creates a minimal

Floppy store size

2002-09-24 Thread Richard Kreuter
Thanks in advance, Richard Kreuter ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd

Re: Running several instances of an fs server...

2002-05-24 Thread Richard Kreuter
If there turn out to be good reasons why multiple users would want write access to the same file hierarchy without clobbering each others' work, probably shadowfs will be the way to do it. Regards, Richard ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy in FHS.

2002-05-22 Thread Richard Kreuter
s of the GNU Coding Standards which aren't FHS compliant. > How about making the GNU FHS an extension to the current > (LSB) FHS. The LSB includes the FHS as part of its specification. Quoting the LSB, Chapter 17: An LSB conforming system

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-21 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:48:38PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Richard Kreuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > At this point, though, the draft doesn't point out any distinctions > > between GNU and GNU/Linux systems, so the whole thing can be drop

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-20 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:51:02PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:50:08AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote: > > Richard Kreuter wasted others' time writing: > > > This is the annex for the GNU operating system. We sometimes refer > > > to

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-12 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 06:17:30PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 06:06:06PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:33:37PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > > Here's a redraft based on the discussion over the last day or >

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-12 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 06:06:06PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:33:37PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > Here's a redraft based on the discussion over the last day or > > so. > > > > The GNU system has been designed with a goal of pro

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-12 Thread Richard Kreuter
Here's a redraft based on the discussion over the last day or so. Same punctuation: +++ is stuff added since last time, <> for editorial remarks. --- The following things need to change in the FHS itself: 3.5.1 Grub may place its configuration file under /boot. 3.9.3 I'm not sure /lib/modules

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-12 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 07:37:01PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:09:08PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:57:42AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > (2) statically linked servers in /hurd may be named foo.static, so &g

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-12 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:57:42AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > * Richard Kreuter writes: > > 6.2.x /hurd : The Hurd servers > > > /hurd contains the Hurd server binaries. Servers with .static appended > > to their name must be statically linked servers, servers with

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-12 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 03:01:18AM +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote: > Richard Kreuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Two comments... > > > /servers/crash The node where the crash server translates. > > I am not a native speaker, but wouldn't be s/where/w

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-11 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 05:45:06PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 06:26:58PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:45:24PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > > In the GNU system, /usr is a symbolic link to /. The / and /usr &

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-11 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 06:26:58PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:45:24PM -0400, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > > > 6.2.x /usr : Secondary Hierarchy > > > > In the GNU system, /usr is a symbolic link to /. The / and /usr > > Note that i

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-05-11 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 06:05:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 10:52:45PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:08:49PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > I think it would be nice to post the GNU things to the mailinglist &g

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-26 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:00:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Richard Kreuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Distributors wishing to maintain compatibility with non-GNU/Hurd > > systems may create symbolic links in the /sbin directory to these > > binar

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-25 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:08:49PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > I think it would be nice to post the GNU things to the mailinglist > before they'll release the next version, which will be soon. I've merged what I've understood from Thomas Bushnell's and Jeroen Dekkers's latest comments. I also

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-25 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:08:49PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:35:29PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 10:16:06PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > I think it would be nice to post the GNU things to the mailinglist > befo

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-25 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 03:36:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Richard Kreuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The /com hierarchy should contain the following directories: > > > > /com/mail > > /com/spool/news > > <...what else?> &g

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-24 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 10:16:06PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > I recently saw another proposal on the FHS mailinglist: > /srv - data generated by users for the services the system offers > > It seemed that they agreed that is was right. Isn't this just a > special case of /com and should th

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-24 Thread Richard Kreuter
AIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > what's the logic behind the /com name? > > We needed a place for mutable data that could be shared between > machines... So should the sharable parts of FHS's /var be in /com on GNU? If so, should /var/mail, et al., be

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-24 Thread Richard Kreuter
thought it was configuration data belonging in /etc, and spent hours looking for it there. :( Richard ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-24 Thread Richard Kreuter
b's are for libraries. As far as I can tell, the GNU coding standards would place the contents of /var/lib in /com. Maybe there are other subdirectories of /var whose contents would be in /com, too. Richard kreuter at ausar.rutgers.edu ___ H

Re: tarfs implementation

2002-03-19 Thread Richard Kreuter
being pretty hairy, and not for the fainthearted. Hope that helps, Richard ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-18 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:35:36PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:49:21PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > > > > Yes, but I can't find a rationale for the /sbin d

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-18 Thread Richard Kreuter
rd systems belong in bin directories on GNU/Hurd, because the unprivileged user is able and encouraged to use them under normal system conditions. Thanks, Richard ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-18 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:34:33PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:30:03AM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > > New, little stuff: > > > > For the GNU annex: several utilities are required for boot or > > restoration of GNU/Hurd, and

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-18 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:02:16AM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 05:43:09PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:36:02PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:31:16PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: >

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-17 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:36:02PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:31:16PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > > > "On a GNU system, the contents of a directory listing need not > > reside on a single volume; therefore directories may be created

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-17 Thread Richard Kreuter
. Instead the X Window System should > be placed in /usr. I thought it was: 'for each directory in X11R6, the contents of that directory should be placed in /usr//X11, if /usr/foo exists when X is not installed, or /usr, if /usr/foo doesn't exist.' This is Debian policy for n

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-17 Thread Richard Kreuter
ady have some work on this, but it's far from finished. I will > finish it when I've more time, I can post it if somebody is > interested in working on it. Sure, I'd like to help. Richard ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-16 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:55:40AM -0500, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:07:53AM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote: > > The main difference at the moment between FHS and the hierarchy now > > used is that /usr is a symlink to /. > > The trick is that t

Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

2002-03-16 Thread Richard Kreuter
how to use apt and another operating system to fetch and install packages, provided that both GNU/Hurd and the other operating system can access a shared filesystem. For now that means the other os has to be a GNU/Linux (may I suggest Debian :)) or a BSD. Hope that Helps, Richard kreuter at a

Re: new user questions

2002-03-13 Thread Richard Kreuter
host-priv-port=${host-port} --device-master-port=${device-port} --exec-server-task=${exec-task} -T typed ${root} $(task-create) module /ld.so.1 /hurd/exec $(exec-task=task-create) Note that that's five lines. Hope that helps, Richard kreuter at ausar.rutgers.edu ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd

Re: new user questions

2002-03-12 Thread Richard Kreuter
e, I don't understand > how to manage that ?? What happens to you here? Anything? Make sure you got the characters all correct at the grub prompt; I've mistyped some a number of times :) Richard kreuter at ausar.rutgers.edu ___ H

Re: yet more newbie questions

2002-03-11 Thread Richard Kreuter
e added, then they ought to be added to oskit. Richard kreuter at ausar.rutgers.edu ___ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd

Re: yet more newbie questions

2002-03-09 Thread Richard
it's non-fatal, and maybe also insignificant. (You might want to do a mailing list archive search for some discussion of this by the Real Hurd Hackers; I think it's a bug in GNUmach that hasn't been important enough to fix.) > Then it stops writing error messages and boots serv

Re: GNU/Hurd

2001-09-28 Thread Richard Stallman
Calling it simply "Debian GNU" will confuse the hell out of a lot of people. "Debian GNU/Hurd" will give it a better and more distinguishable identity. GNU and GNU/Hurd are two names for the same system; the latter name emphasizes the fact that the kernel is the Hurd. It is useful to

HURD's OO structure?

2000-06-20 Thread Richard Russo
Hello, I read on the HURD homepage that it has an "object-oriented structure" (under the "it's built to survive" heading). Does this mean that parts of it are actually written in C++, or that the style and design exhibit OO patterns? Thanks, Richard

Re: help-hurd

2000-06-19 Thread Richard Russo
or you, too. I guess it is a GRUB issue and not one of the HURD. Thanks, Richard