On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Adam wrote:
> Were you referring to Hobo or Heroku for your hobby projects? Im new
> to Heroku, but I do fancy Hobo. Its definitely a bit slower than
> native Rails but i like the gracefulness of the model/schema
> definitions along with a bunch of extra handy hel
Im ignoring the dependencies because of a Rails version conflict.
There is a Heroku recipes on their website that includes these
instructions.
Were you referring to Hobo or Heroku for your hobby projects? Im new
to Heroku, but I do fancy Hobo. Its definitely a bit slower than
native Rails but i li
Run the hobo generators locally, check the results in to git, then
push that to heroku.
If hobo expects to be able to generate files at run-time then it isn't
going to work out of the box with Heroku. It won't be able to create
the files on the read-only filesystem.
Mike
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at
Why are you ignoring dependencies?
I would take that out for a start, and see what gems heroku is trying to
source
when it builds your slug.
I usually far too sloppy in my hobby projects and never know what gems I
am using when I push to heroku. Its just discipline to stay on top of your
gems.
N
Ok. Ive figured out that one of hobos build in generators isnt running
correctly. It should be running [1] but isnt. Ive tried [2] but I get
a read-only error. Any ideas?
[1] rake hobo:generate_taglibs
[2] heroku hobo:generate_taglibs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
First off im new to Heroku but aside from a few frustrations I think
its pretty cool.
Ive been trying to Heroku to play nicely with the Hobo gem. The app im
using is just the default app hobo generates. The process im using to
create and deploy my application is as follows:
1) hobo test_app
2) ./
