That is very strange...
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
HSQLDB
Default hibernate.properties
Gavin King wrote:
On what database?
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Any reason why some test.legacy tests fail ?
--
Gavin King
+61 410 534 454
+1 404 822 8349
callto://gavinking
Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hiberna
HSQLDB
Default hibernate.properties
Gavin King wrote:
On what database?
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Any reason why some test.legacy tests fail ?
--
Emmanuel Bernard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hibernate.org
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT
On what database?
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Any reason why some test.legacy tests fail ?
--
Gavin King
+61 410 534 454
+1 404 822 8349
callto://gavinking
Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hibernate.org
JBoss Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jboss.com
---
Thanks!
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
done
Gavin King wrote:
Drop it :)
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Sun fixed the backward compatibility bug we had on
javax.nnaming.spi.ObjectFactory.getObjectInstance(Object, Name,
Context, Hashtable);
by changing Hashtable to HashTable
We now have 2 options:
- keep the jdk
done
Gavin King wrote:
Drop it :)
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Sun fixed the backward compatibility bug we had on
javax.nnaming.spi.ObjectFactory.getObjectInstance(Object, Name,
Context, Hashtable);
by changing Hashtable to HashTable
We now have 2 options:
- keep the jdk15 hack I did in the build proce
Any reason why some test.legacy tests fail ?
--
Emmanuel Bernard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hibernate.org
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of t
Just to clarify this does not eliminate the regions. It just corrects
the way the provider implemented them. You can put and flush into the
region. You can set different refresh periods and cron policies per
region. You just cannot set a separate capacity. Oscache groups sort of
= hibernate regi
No, I'm not really interested in this patch. Entire assumption of
Hibernate cache architecture is that we have various cache regions.
You will notice that we don't recommend OSCache to be used in a cluster.
March, Andres wrote:
I have a patch for the OSCache classes that are part of hibernate to
Drop it :)
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Sun fixed the backward compatibility bug we had on
javax.nnaming.spi.ObjectFactory.getObjectInstance(Object, Name,
Context, Hashtable);
by changing Hashtable to HashTable
We now have 2 options:
- keep the jdk15 hack I did in the build process and gain a more
rob
March, Andres wrote:
I have a patch for the OSCache classes that are part of hibernate to
fix the issues with clustering when using this provider. If you were
not aware, the cluster listener is set up in oscache per cache
instance. Since the provider was creating a cache for each region, it
wo
I have a patch for the OSCache classes that are part of
hibernate to fix the issues with clustering when using this provider. If
you were not aware, the cluster listener is set up in oscache per cache
instance. Since the provider was creating a cache for each region, it
would fail in a cl
I guess JCA is *really* meant for managing resources, which Hibernate is
not.
Personally I think JMX is a more elegant solution...
Igor Fedorenko wrote:
Hello,
I have a general question about usability of Hibernate JCA adapter. As
far as I can tell, current adapter code has not changed much from
Sun fixed the backward compatibility bug we had on
javax.nnaming.spi.ObjectFactory.getObjectInstance(Object, Name, Context,
Hashtable);
by changing Hashtable to HashTable
We now have 2 options:
- keep the jdk15 hack I did in the build process and gain a more robust
implementation (generics usage)
Use the user forum, you'll have better feedback on real life use of JCA
Igor Fedorenko wrote:
Hello,
I have a general question about usability of Hibernate JCA adapter. As
far as I can tell, current adapter code has not changed much from the
prototype-grade code submitted almost two years ago. Th
Hello,
I have a general question about usability of Hibernate JCA adapter. As
far as I can tell, current adapter code has not changed much from the
prototype-grade code submitted almost two years ago. That makes me
suspect that it is not being really used. And apparently JBoss decided
not to us
15 matches
Mail list logo