Re: [Histonet] Benchmarks for reprocessing

2019-05-09 Thread Bob Richmond via Histonet
Cristi Rigazio asks: I was wondering if there are any tertiary institutions out there that have set a benchmark for reprocessing tissue? We tend to be less than 1%, but would love to see what others think is reasonable.<< This grumpy old pathologist sez: If I'm the one doing the grossing, I

Re: [Histonet] Benchmarks for reprocessing

2019-05-09 Thread Terri Braud via Histonet
- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 16:20:24 -0400 From: Cristi Rigazio To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Benchmarks for Reprocessing Message-ID: <8c3b3b9e-6878-4932-9e20-4c1700840...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Good afternoon Fello

Re: [Histonet] Benchmarks for Reprocessing

2019-05-08 Thread Morken, Timothy via Histonet
] Benchmarks for Reprocessing > Good afternoon Fellow histonetters! > > I was wondering if there are any tertiary institutions out there that have > set a benchmark for reprocessing tissue? We tend to be less than 1%, but > would love to see what others think is reasonab

[Histonet] Benchmarks for Reprocessing

2019-05-08 Thread Cristi Rigazio via Histonet
> Good afternoon Fellow histonetters! > > I was wondering if there are any tertiary institutions out there that have > set a benchmark for reprocessing tissue? We tend to be less than 1%, but > would love to see what others think is reasonable. > > Thanks for the feedback and hope you all

[Histonet] Benchmarks for Reprocessing

2019-05-07 Thread Cristi Rigazio via Histonet
Good afternoon Fellow histonetters! I was wondering if there are any tertiary institutions out there that have set a benchmark for reprocessing tissue? We tend to be less than 1%, but would love to see what others think is reasonable. Thanks for the feedback and hope you all are having an