;
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Instrument Verification
Hello All
Coming from a GLP environment this type of equipment validation is standard in
our setting. This is just my opinion but I think the CAP checklist is moving
towards the type of equipment documentation
...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Elizabeth
Chlipala
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:17 PM
To: Martha Ward-Pathology; Cynthia Robinson; Terri Braud;
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Instrument Verification
Hello All
Coming from a GLP environment this type
...@holyredeemer.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:16:58 -0600
CC:
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Instrument Verification
Hello All
Coming from a GLP environment this type of equipment validation is standard
in our setting. This is just my opinion but I think the CAP checklist
@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] RE: Instrument Verification
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:08:54 +
I must say, the first time I read ANP.23045 I had the same reaction you all
did. After reading it over a couple of times, we started looking at it
differently. The question is not about validation
I just received my midcycle CAP and for cryostat validation, we are
planning to cut and stain a piece of frozen tonsil and have the path
sign off on it. For the tissue processors, we will run a one minute test
program. I hope this will fly. Is it just me, or is CAP insanely out of
control with
: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:00 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Instrument Verification
I just received my midcycle CAP and for cryostat validation, we are planning to
cut and stain a piece of frozen tonsil and have the path sign off on it. For
the tissue processors, we
; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Instrument Verification
I agree with you in that CAP is just looking for things to change and doesn't
seem to be considering the change and decrease in staffing seen in clinical
settings. Cryostat validation? Reallycut a slide after
: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:22 PM
To: Cynthia Robinson; Terri Braud; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Instrument Verification
I'm with you. There really appears to be no value to this particular
requirement.I would only be concerned with it if I had just purchased
@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:16:58 -0600
CC:
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Instrument Verification
Hello All
Coming from a GLP environment this type of equipment validation is standard
in our setting. This is just my opinion but I think the CAP checklist is
moving towards
