Re: release 0.6

2010-10-06 Thread Carl Steinbach
r in the > next 2-3 days. > > > > Thanks, > -namit > > > > From: Namit Jain [nj...@facebook.com] > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:44 AM > To: Carl Steinbach > Cc: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: rel

RE: release 0.6

2010-10-06 Thread Namit Jain
] Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:44 AM To: Carl Steinbach Cc: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: release 0.6 I am not sure what kind of downtime would it involve for us (facebook). We will have to make a copy of the production metastore, and then perform the changes. If that takes a long

RE: release 0.6

2010-10-01 Thread Namit Jain
you. Thanks, -namit From: Carl Steinbach [mailto:c...@cloudera.com] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 11:23 PM To: Namit Jain Cc: hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: release 0.6 Hi Namit, It used to be much higher in the beginning but quite a few users reported problems on some mysql dbs

Re: release 0.6

2010-09-30 Thread Carl Steinbach
Hi Namit, It used to be much higher in the beginning but quite a few users reported > problems on some mysql dbs. 767 seemed to work most dbs. before committing > this can someone test this on some different dbs (with and without UTF > encoding)? > Copying my response to Prasad from HIVE-1364: "I

RE: release 0.6

2010-09-30 Thread Namit Jain
@hadoop.apache.org; Namit Jain Subject: Re: release 0.6 Hi Namit, HIVE-1364 is required since various people have found the current size limitations to be too small, especially when using the HBase storage handler and views. Please review and commit this patch. HIVE-1427 is also a requirement due to

Re: release 0.6

2010-09-30 Thread Carl Steinbach
Hi Namit, HIVE-1364 is required since various people have found the current size limitations to be too small, especially when using the HBase storage handler and views. Please review and commit this patch. HIVE-1427 is also a requirement due to metastore schema changes that were made in the follo