Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-02-01 Thread British_Bomber
So, I hear steam was written using C++ *sorry* Just trying my hardest to kill this topic ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread British_Bomber
GO STEAM 3 to Valve for being ahead of the game, even though everyone bitches about it ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Maarten van der Zwaart
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:53:26PM -0600, Brian 'Satertek' Irelan wrote: Am I the only one in the world that has never had a problem with Steam? Except for the Friends downtime (which hasn't happened as often lately) I've never had any problems. No you are not the only one. But the people who

Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Vyacheslav Djura
Hello Maarten, Monday, January 31, 2005, 3:06:13 PM, you wrote: MvdZ Could we now please end this horribly off topic thread? Let us end when we'll hear some reply from Valve. Why do they ignore us? Why do their support doesn't work? I received yesterday a letter from one guy who lives in USA out

Re: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Chris Ashworth
For christ's sake this is a coding mailing list I'm sick of this crap filling my inbox. Can you *please* take it elsewhere. On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:10:45 +0200, Vyacheslav Djura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Maarten, Monday, January 31, 2005, 3:06:13 PM, you wrote: MvdZ Could we now please

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Jeffrey \botman\ Broome
Vyacheslav Djura wrote: Let us end when we'll hear some reply from Valve. Why do they ignore us? Why do their support doesn't work? I usually try to avoid responding to threads in a holy war (vi vs. emacs, windows vs linux, etc). *Must resist urge to reply*, *Urge too stong, can't resist urge to

Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Vyacheslav Djura
Hello Jeffrey, Monday, January 31, 2005, 4:44:07 PM, you wrote: JbB RETURN IT and get your money back (most places have JbB consumer protection laws where you are legally allowed to return JbB something if you discover that it doesn't work as advertised). I do not want to return the product, I

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread James Freedman
That's all very well, but I hardly think filling up *our* inboxes with complaints is going to help your cause. Post on anti-steam sites, start a petition, e-mail Valve - these are all valid ways of getting your point across. Diluting this mailing list with off-topic, in my opinion, isn't. James

RE: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Karl \XP-Cagey\ Patrick
I don't suppose there's a way to block off topic spammers from the list? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vyacheslav Djura Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 7:59 AM To: Jeffrey botman Broome Subject: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

RE: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread HoundDawg
I'm not sure what all the fuss over no-offline mode is anymore. I admit, that I complained about it at first, but after working with the SDK for awhile now, I don't have any problems with it, nor do many, many other MOD teams. Valve has been able to keep their servers online and available so I

RE: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Steven Guy
@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:59:07 +0200 Hello Jeffrey, Monday, January 31, 2005, 4:44:07 PM, you wrote: JbB RETURN IT and get your money back (most places have JbB consumer protection laws where you are legally allowed to return JbB something

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Knifa
There's no offline mode? Does that mean no one can have LAN Partys with CS/HL2DM? I'm not sure what all the fuss over no-offline mode is anymore. I admit, that I complained about it at first, but after working with the SDK for awhile now, I don't have any problems with it, nor do many, many other

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Steven Guy
as the game you want to play has been completely downloaded. From: Knifa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:47:05 + There's no offline mode? Does that mean no one

Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Vyacheslav Djura
K There's no offline mode? Does that mean no one can have LAN Partys with K CS/HL2DM? Under same Steam account - no. SG This is NOT on topic for this list. I don't see the need for valve to SG respond for steam customer support on a coding list. Please stop spamming my SG in-box with anti-steam

RE: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Steven Guy
From: Vyacheslav Djura [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com To: Knifa hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:02:08 +0200 K There's no offline mode? Does that mean no one can have LAN Partys with K CS

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Pierre-Marie Baty
OK, got 26 emails, in 12 hours, from this list, half of which for this very thread, which makes an average of more than 1 email every 30 minutes landing in my mailbox to teach me some fascinating things about the usefulness of the Steam platform, and a lot of other unsortable things which I'll

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-31 Thread Luke Graham
This thread is no different to any other internet forum. The first rule is always, Dont feed the trolls. Its too late for this thread, its already pissing everyone off, but next time... can we learn from our mistakes here? Please? No grief to feed on means no joy for the trolls, so they go away

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-30 Thread Legshot
Justin Harvey schrieb: Alright already. Go to the steam forums if you would like to bitch about steam, this list is for coding. how about reading? didn't mention steam at all in the mail you're quoting. oh and tell me, was someone holding a gun against your head, forcing you to read my mail? no?

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-30 Thread Dan Partelly
Let ppl complain about shitty Steam all over the place. Its what Valve deserves for this idiot ideea. - Original Message - From: Legshot [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 3:42 PM Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Justin

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-30 Thread Pierre-Marie Baty
Well, I thought this list was for Half-Life coding discussions. But if such useful and time-saving mails keep cluttering my mailbox, perhaps I should consider unsubscribing. That must be just me, of course. -- Pierre-Marie Baty http://forums.bots-united.com - Original Message - From: Dan

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-30 Thread Bad HAL 9000
I am about to do the same. Stop this nonsense Pierre-Marie Baty wrote: Well, I thought this list was for Half-Life coding discussions. But if such useful and time-saving mails keep cluttering my mailbox, perhaps I should consider unsubscribing. That must be just me, of course. -- Pierre-Marie Baty

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-30 Thread Brian 'Satertek' Irelan
Am I the only one in the world that has never had a problem with Steam? Except for the Friends downtime (which hasn't happened as often lately) I've never had any problems. On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:19:00 -0600, Bad HAL 9000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to do the same. Stop this nonsense

Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-29 Thread Vyacheslav Djura
Hello Justin, Saturday, January 29, 2005, 2:14:52 AM, you wrote: JH Alright already. Go to the steam forums if you would like to bitch about steam, JH this list is for coding. No, let Valve programmers know what we think about their child. -- Best regards, Vyacheslav

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-28 Thread Legshot
Ben Davison schrieb: As was most of the above posters points. I was not aware that I made any excuses... Valve might have a teeny bit of influence but with most games the publisher gets the final say with any physical packaging. And now tell me who chose their publisher for them? Also please

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-28 Thread Justin Harvey
/me yawns. Alright already. Go to the steam forums if you would like to bitch about steam, this list is for coding. -- www.neotokyohq.com Quoting Legshot [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ben Davison schrieb: As was most of the above posters points. I was not aware that I made any excuses... Valve

RE: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread S. Hendriks
Knifa Verzonden: woensdag 26 januari 2005 0:32 Aan: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Onderwerp: Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure I agree, it does use ALOT of memory. It's not like it even needs it. The downloads go pretty quick for me though. Make an option to turn off the skins? Can't

RE: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Josh
Any of the devs have anything to say about this? I notice this as well, sometimes when doing steam updates I have to just stop it b/c it consumes so much. And I have a p4 3.0 w/1GB RAM. It uses up to like 70% of my CPU at times. Josh ___ To

Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Vyacheslav Djura
Hello knighthk, Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 1:27:22 AM, you wrote: kgn Okay now this is definately off-topic. Let's not have a steam-flame kgn here, please.. Why? Let's talk here, because it seems that there is no other official place where we can talk about that. I also think that idea behind

Re: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Ben Davison
Why? Let's talk here, because it seems that there is no other official place where we can talk about that. www.steampowered.com Packaging is poor - discs are in envelopes, they are just useless without Steam and there is even no manual!!! What a shame. Vivendi's area of concern not valve. Why

RE: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread S. Hendriks
http://www.bots-united.com === -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Ben Davison Verzonden: woensdag 26 januari 2005 14:57 Aan: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Onderwerp: Re: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam

RE: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread S. Hendriks
: woensdag 26 januari 2005 14:09 Aan: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Onderwerp: RE: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Any of the devs have anything to say about this? I notice this as well, sometimes when doing steam updates I have to just stop it b/c it consumes so much. And I have a p4 3.0 w/1GB

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Ben Davison
-united.com http://www.bots-united.com === -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Josh Verzonden: woensdag 26 januari 2005 14:09 Aan: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Onderwerp: RE: [hlcoders] Steam

RE: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread S. Hendriks
: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Fixed 100% CPU use on startup From steams changelog, so that's probably from before that they noticed that bug. On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:14:39 +0100, S. Hendriks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps this is just a stupid comment (so if so, don't say it is, makes

Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Vyacheslav Djura
Hello Ben, Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 3:57:16 PM, you wrote: BD www.steampowered.com Please be more careful reading my letter - I told you that we HAVE TRIED several times and they just ignored us. The only thing I received (3 or 4 weeks ago) was some letter your question is in the queue for

Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Ben Davison
I am not a noob who found link to this mailing list today and just decided to write here, Nice personal insults :thumbsup: Then you go on to call me a fanboy in other words. As soon as you started with the personal insults it immediatly invalidates all your arguments. I'll be stepping out of

Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Dan Partelly
Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:11 PM Subject: Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure I am not a noob who found link to this mailing list today and just decided to write here, Nice personal insults :thumbsup: Then you go

Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Ben Davison
an argument. Dan - Original Message - From: Ben Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:11 PM Subject: Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure I am not a noob who found link to this mailing list today and just

Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Dan Partelly
- Original Message - From: Ben Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:30 PM Subject: Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure I am not a noob who found link to this mailing list today and just decided to write here, That is very much

Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Ben Davison
@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:30 PM Subject: Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure I am not a noob who found link to this mailing list today and just decided to write here, That is very much of an insult. And usually when someone can't backup their points

RE: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread S. Hendriks
@list.valvesoftware.com Onderwerp: Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Ok we are about to go round in circles here. He was calling ME a noob. And i don't think you get my other points. On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:58:58 +0200, Dan Partelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not a noob who found

Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Ben Davison
=== -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Ben Davison Verzonden: woensdag 26 januari 2005 21:04 Aan: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Onderwerp: Re: Re[4]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Ok we are about to go round in circles here. He

Re[6]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Vyacheslav Djura
Hello Ben, Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 8:11:01 PM, you wrote: BD I am not a BD noob who found link to this mailing list today and just decided to BD write here, BD Nice personal insults :thumbsup: Sorry I didn't mean that to be personal insult to you. I wrote this because I thought that you

Re: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Ben Davison
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Ben Davison Verzonden: woensdag 26 januari 2005 14:57 Aan: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Onderwerp: Re: Re[2]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure Why? Let's talk here, because it seems that there is no other official place where we can talk

Re: Re[6]: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Ben Davison
That is quite alright I did not intend to call you a noob and im sorry you took it that way, what I meant works both ways for us. Just because your having issues does not mean the vast majority of people are having issues. It also works out. Just because the vast majority of people are not

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread tei
S. Hendriks wrote: Little children could we stay on topic like grown ups? The subject is STEAM, we shared our points. If nobody has something to say that could make this 'discussion' fruitable, i'd say, we stop this discussion right now. My secret plot its to bomb the Valve hq with Richard

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Martin \E.T.\ Misuth
Ben Davison wrote: And for original poster, steam is currently using 0 CPU and 2 megs of ram, it's not just a gui steam acts as an interface for a virtual filesystem aswell. Ok, so how do you explain following situtation ? http://steam.ethome.sk/steam.png If I open several Steam windows at same

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Grant Christensen
Well then obviously thunderbird is bloated ware as well, and all it does is read mail doesn't it? On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:42:21 +0100, Martin E.T. Misuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Davison wrote: And for original poster, steam is currently using 0 CPU and 2 megs of ram, it's not just a gui

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread jeff broome
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:16:28 +1000, Grant Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well then obviously thunderbird is bloated ware as well, and all it does is read mail doesn't it? Hmmm, maybe Valve could scrap Steam and use Kermit instead? Check out the features: - Error-free file transfer.

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-26 Thread Grant Christensen
Oh how sad, I remember using Kermit on dial-up BBS's back in the early 90's. Did you have to take me back there :) Anyway - on topic, I have no problems at all with steam running. Sicne they have fixed the slow load times on the SDK etc, it runs like a charm, and that is on a 1.6 Celeron laptop.

[hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-25 Thread Martin \E.T.\ Misuth
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- Fist to tell, this is something like rant essay. Forgive my bad english too, I'm not native speaker. I do really like Half-Lives and Valve for delivering such great games. I think that idea behind Steam is good too, actually I like the idea very

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-25 Thread Knifa
I agree, it does use ALOT of memory. It's not like it even needs it. The downloads go pretty quick for me though. Make an option to turn off the skins? Can't be Steam made smaller, quicker and friendlier? Why that worm rotten IE must be used for rendering of couple of news messages? Why it eats so

Re: [hlcoders] Steam: Technology failure

2005-01-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay now this is definately off-topic. Let's not have a steam-flame here, please.. Now about my name question.. :) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: