loved the jay and silent bob reference sandy :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SANDY LEBLANC
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 6:53 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Coming Soon BS...
[ Converted text/html to text/plain
Valve may have no control over DoD:S. I thought it was Activision that
was holding the game due to whatever reasons. (forgive me if I am wrong) ;)
Regards
SANDY LEBLANC wrote:
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
I wasn't going to say anything after your first email but damn dude,
somethin
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
I wasn't going to say anything after your first email but damn dude, something
shit in your cereal or something that made you want to bitch at people
tonight?
As for DoD:s, would you rather them give a release date & not have it out at
that time & get floode
Valve,
Wasn't going to post about this, but every time I look at it, it pisses
me off. S...
[rant=on]
DOD:S has been coming soon for almost a year, and now to add insult to
injury, you put ANOTHER game in the coming soon category? Didn't you
learn your lesson the first time?
Not only will
hehehe, not to burst your bubble, but you do. With all due respect and love to
Valve, we are all their beta testers, usually after every update. Hence the
reason for this thread to begin with ;-)
-Smurf
Message: 8
From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: Re: [hlds] Roll back on client
Dat
Shawn Zipay:
I dont understand how you don't realize you don't know wtf you are
talking about. READ the mails that come over this list from valve,
you'll soon find out what you are saying is dead wrong.
Actually, I agree, a rollback on the updates is about a dumbass way to
go about fixing this.
/sigh Why does this list have such a troll infestation
Thanks, but I don't believe he was asking you. No its not "UNSUPPORTED", Valve
has said, several times, they are working on it. So there IS support there, at some level
or another.
So while we all appreciate you pointing out the obvious (t
Thx for the heads up, i have made a amxmodx plugin to detect this exploit.
If someone has a populated DoD server and can help me beta test, please
email me offlist.
Il release to the public once its had a minor beta test.
- Original Message -
From: "Your Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sen
DlinkOZ,
Good Question. Seeing how the updates were a series where the Server and
Client both were update... I would have to say Steam.exe is the culprit.
Which is drirectly related to the client..
I will leave it at that.. seeing how I recently said I was shutting my mouth
and just going to eat
Amen.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 8:43 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Roll back on client
Okay... so to end this whole problem... I guess I am wrong to Bitch,
Moan
and Groan, Be
Quick question, is this a client related FPS/lag issue being discussed? The
recent -sport issue was absolutely relevant to this list, as it was a server
related problem. It would be a lie to say I've followed this thread
closely, so wanted clarification on which piece of the software this is
aff
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn Zipay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I said major problems meaning the majority of Steam users. That is not
the case. At last check there are some 30.5K users playing CS: Source
alone right now. That is hardly the majority of CS: Source owners that
are experien
Okay... so to end this whole problem... I guess I am wrong to Bitch, Moan
and Groan, Because I have a Problem and a part of a small select group
affected as well...
Well excuse the Hell of me and all the little people for bringing this up
and taken so much of your time... when the pupose of this
I said major problems meaning the majority of Steam users. That is not
the case. At last check there are some 30.5K users playing CS: Source
alone right now. That is hardly the majority of CS: Source owners that
are experiencing the problem you describe be it on X64 or 32bit OS's.
Like I said,
yes that is exactly why we need official word from Valve Alfred ?
- Original Message -
From: "James Grimstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 11:51 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] VAC2 et Cheating Death ?
I read on some forum, probly a cheating one or some news post,
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
Ok so then say 100 people out of a few hundred thousand that are having
problems.
Nope, can't see a roll back for a handfull of people.
From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To:
Subject: Re: [hlds] Roll back on client
Date:
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
I have yet to experience any problems with this & coincidentally, that last
update fixed a voice issue I was haing in tfc where I could no longer hear
voice if I was in water. Now I can go in & out of water without losing the
ability to hear voice still.
Fr
Oh??? And another question... What Beta Software are you refering to??? I
have nothing running BETA on my system...
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn Zipay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Roll back on client
Really I don't understan
Well Zipay,
If you had read my message... which you have not.. it is NOT only X64 seeing
the problem... how many users would you like to know??? I personally can
count 81 People Having the problem on Win 32 XP Pro... So please before you
continue... READ the whole Post... and do not stop at X64
Thanks Sandy... with regards to that... however the last in the Forum by
Steam was no not pursuing this one.. Actually the only thing I would be
happy with is restoring the latest changes to correct the immediate problem
at hand... The number of Users having a problem with 1 - 5 minutes of play,
t
Really I don't understand how you don't realize the fact that X64 just
isn't a supported OS. To roll back an update that is working fine for a
majority of the people is just asinine. Perhaps if the update caused
major problems on 32bit OS's then there'd be cause for alarm. Why?
Because Windows
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
Actually, I believe Alfred said they were working on something along those
lines but won't be released for quite awhile, but they are working on it.
From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To:
Subject: Re: [hlds] Roll back on
Well Thank you so very much... for your two cents... let me know when you
start at Valve in the mean time... thank you but no thank you...
Have a wonderful day...
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn Zipay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Ro
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
Someone from the UA forums had asked VALVe's support about this & they said
that since CD is not a cheat, you won't get VAC banned but they are waiting
for an OFFICIAL responce from VALVe themselves.
From: "James Grimstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hld
"Unsupported." All you need to know really.
Jim wrote:
Yeah well... no one asked for a X64 Version... However, this last update
took a working product and caused not only X64 Clients to stop working
properly but affected a number of other OS clients... as well, Hence
the 3
days straight of upl
Yeah well... no one asked for a X64 Version... However, this last update
took a working product and caused not only X64 Clients to stop working
properly but affected a number of other OS clients... as well, Hence the 3
days straight of uploads.
Now it would be simple if X64 only ran 64 bit applic
I read on some forum, probly a cheating one or some news post, that C-D is
based on the same hooking method as the original OGC. If VAC2 has generic
methods of detecting ogc style cheats, then CD would most likely get you
banned. This was a while ago though, it may have changed since then.
-
Last I knew Valve doesn't support X64. Unsupported means they offer no
promises about Steam or any of the games working on that OS and are
under no obligation to provide fixes for it. In all honesty for your
using an unsupported OS it's fortunate that you were even able to get
Steam working in t
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Alfred,
I know you said Steam is aware of a problem with X64 Windows. In the short term
can we roll the client back to prior to this last update. Seems this problem is
most prevelate with the Wind
Hi and thanks for your reply.
Yes, there are CS:S Servers on that server and they all use the same
IP. Firewall is not an issue. For the other CS:S Server I did not need
the -sport option and they all use VAC2. This morning the game server
I refrenced to worked with VAC2, but I'm not sure if this i
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
The UA guys are waiting for an actual reply from VALVe themselves.
From: "Oum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To:
Subject: Re: [hlds] VAC2 et Cheating Death ?
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:37:52 +0100
forget : Valve Support says it'
yes I've seen this thread, and same in steampowered forum but I think
this kind of answer from Valve Support does really need an official word
from Valve... I will not take any risk with my steamid :s
- Original Message -
From: "SANDY LEBLANC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, A
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
Apparently, VALVe's support has answered saying that it is not a cheat & won't
get you banned. See the thread VAC2 & CD in the unitedadmins forums.
From: "Oum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To:
Subject: [hlds] VAC2 et Cheating D
forget : Valve Support says it's ok :/
http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=324872
is that official ?
- Original Message -
From: "Oum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: [hlds] VAC2 et Cheating Death ?
from
http://forum
from http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=282892
:
9.1) Will it be possible to run VAC 2 and Cheating-Death together on a
Server?
To be determined.
Ok we know now VAC2 and CD can run together on a server but is it safe
to join a vac secure server with CD ?
I think
There are servel paths to manage memory. Most of these paths are not
published due to the prue fact the MS does not want to end up supporting a
bunce of wet needles that are tring to over perform there OS so there
solitare runs better. Please keep in mind that any thing you read from
Microsoft is
I think perhaps a refresher is warranted here, since you're forgetting
one basic fact, which is even mentioned in the article listed.
"Virtual Memory is always in use, even when the memory required by all
running processes does not exceed the amount of RAM installed on the
system."
You should alw
MS themselves say that there is no way for us to know how much of any
process is in RAM and how much is in the pagefile, so, I don't know
where you're getting this information from. Besides, *everything* is
in virtual memory. And there is no point in keeping pages in RAM that
aren't being accesse
Scott Tuttle wrote:
One simple way of forcing Windows to use more ram and less hard drive for
paging is to set you page file size and do not allow windows to manage it's
own file size. But do keep in mind windows is designed to page data that is
not needed out of RAM into the page file. Restric
Your Name wrote:
One of my regulars pointed out someone doing something fishy on a
server today and the idiot actually talked enough about it that I
could track it down.
If he was telling you the truth of course.
http://www.gotfrag.com/dod/forums/thread/147822/
Remember, forums are popula
I'd rather they were fixed before the masses join in.
On 8/14/05, list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd *rather* them be posted openly. This way it alerts everyone to the
> exploit. Yes, I understand that there would be people that take advantage of
> this, but for those of us that work in the HL
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
I downloaded a fresh copy of srcds and cs:s friday, and still have the same
behavior with no add on (including the stats tracking perl script turned off).
No mani mod, no small statsme, and no hlstatsx, and players are still
disconnecting 1-3 secon
I'd *rather* them be posted openly. This way it alerts everyone to the
exploit. Yes, I understand that there would be people that take advantage of
this, but for those of us that work in the HL leagues, it provides much
needed information.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
basic troubleshooting, remove all addons... There's no sense
wondering why something is going on if you're not going to try to
track it down. Remove everything you'd added, see if behaviour goes
away or keeps happening. If it goes away, put your addons back *one
at a time* until you see the beha
44 matches
Mail list logo
