At 03:10 AM 1/11/2006 -0600, you wrote:
>I wonder why I just got this ... loads of fun with mailing lists.
Because I was trying to confirm an assumption and you seemed
an appropriate person to piggyback upon?
- Dan
* Dan Sorenson DoD #1066 A.H.M.C. #35 [EMA
I wonder why I just got this ... loads of fun with mailing lists.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Sorenson
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:10 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
At 09:14
At 09:14 AM 12/10/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>1 user per CALThat means exactly ANY user listed in the Users Group of
>the OS. You must have a CAL for any remote authenticated access to the OS.
>Logging into the OS is done with authentication with the MS product.
That's for MS authenticati
is the OS for me
- Original Message -
From: "Tyler Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Already switched from web to standar,
all
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 1:34 AM
> To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
>
> I would suggest, Windows Server 2003 Standard. (You can probably use SBS,
> but I keep a domain of all of my Windows servers and SBS has
] On Behalf Of Stuart Stegall
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 1:34 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
I would suggest, Windows Server 2003 Standard. (You can probably use SBS,
but I keep a domain of all of my Windows servers and SBS has some big limits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of infexXxiousservers
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 2:20 AM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
lol ok ok ok stop the win2k3 web edition bashing !!!
im about to cry!!! lol
i only use windows server
so which operating system would you guys
day, December 09, 2005 9:10 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
> My arena of business is basically web hosting. I have been in a PoP that
> has been audited, and while my servers were all in compliance, I know the
> vendor in the rack next to mine paid like 30k in licensing
ftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
Can't say I agree with that. The OS is only restricted in what Microsoft
products you run on it. Game servers are considered 3rd party applications
and cannot fall under MS licensing. We don't personally use it but many
providers offer it
ent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:03 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
The web server edition is geared for maxized IIS and SQL services (pending
the product version), The attemps I tried with W3K Web edition ended with
serval services (including my srcds serve
are.com
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows Server 2003 web?
The web server edition is geared for maxized IIS and SQL services (pending
the product version), The attemps I tried with W3K Web edition ended with
serval services (including my srcds server) suffering from a lack of CPU
cycles even when I attempt
The web server edition is geared for maxized IIS and SQL services (pending
the product version), The attemps I tried with W3K Web edition ended with
serval services (including my srcds server) suffering from a lack of CPU
cycles even when I attempted to shut down the IIS and the IIS Admin
services
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/overview/web.mspx
Basically it says you're not allowed to do anything OTHER then host web
pages. But it doesn't physically stop from hosting your own type of
server.
The company I work for purchased a Dell storage server, using
Windows Storag
13 matches
Mail list logo
