And yes, a single HLDS server IS running on two separate
CPU's.
It is running on both CPUs, but NOT CONCURRENTLY. What the graph is showing
(due to the data capturing method, I assume) is that the single HLDS process
is being bounced from one CPU to another. As this bouncing can occur every
yeah works fine in combination with qstat. had a quick setup and
I'll enhance the site with cpu, ram and nic stats due to this
topic ;-)
http://www.igazo.de/mrtg
P.S. I prefer mrtg's graphs (rrdtools graphs are ugly :-)))
Ok, the URL points to a graph. The vertical legend of the graph
Personally, I kinda like this one (for CS):
http://bfb.bogleg.org/status.pl?s=bfb-cs2
;)
StanTheMan
TheHardwareFreak
http://www.hardwarefreak.com
rcon admin at:
Beer for Breakfast servershttp://bfb.bogleg.org/
209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD)
Stan, the numbers along the bottom of the graph are times of the day. It
becomes more clear when you click the graph and the entire MRTG history page
shows up. It's a standard MRTG x axis quantity.
Edge100x
- Original Message -
From: Stan Hoeppner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well apparently it affected your ability to cheat enough that it prompted
you to send this email. Just wait till Valve improves it.
Soon, you and your cheating buddies will be out of business. What will you
do then? Attempt to mail flood every admin on this list, Karl? Or, wait,
is Karl one
Stan, the numbers along the bottom of the graph are times of
the day. It
becomes more clear when you click the graph and the entire
MRTG history page
shows up. It's a standard MRTG x axis quantity.
Edge100x
Ahh. Thx. Didn't realize the image was linked, heh.
Stan
Afaik the VAC-Whblock is not using any server-CPU time cause it is
running on the Client completely. The Server is only involved in
distributing the VAC-module.
HLGuard is completely server-side so it is taking a lot of CPU time.
VAC Wallhackblock is more like Cheating Death.
The disadvantage
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 07:19, Mike Hodgkinson wrote:
No
- Original Message -
From: James Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:55 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] Wall Hack Block / Sound Hack
Does this stop the Sound Hack from working?
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 02:38, Nick McLaren wrote:
Remember, the occluder is purposefully configured to be a bit conservative
in what it occludes in order to prevent issues where a player is occluded
in the non-wallhacked game when they are supposed to be visible. In other
words, to make
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Personally, I kinda like this one (for CS):
http://bfb.bogleg.org/status.pl?s=bfb-cs2
;)
StanTheMan
TheHardwareFreak
http://www.hardwarefreak.com
rcon admin at:
Beer for Breakfast servers
209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD)
209.41.98.2:27017
What I'm hearing is...
1 HLDS + 2 CPUs = No performance gain, maybe a loss.
2 HLDS + 2 CPUs = W!!!
Right?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
My thoughts are that people cheat because they want to feel cool. I
don't really think it goes any deeper than that. They just want people
to like them and think they are good.
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 18:28, Brian A. Stumm wrote:
Hi,
I've had serious problems lately with what seems like
Jay Anstiss wrote:
Site: http://www.clan-jpf.com/ - in the menu bar on the left
select the
SERVER STATUS option(before anyone asks - yes, I have
emailed the site's
creator about it...) it has a very neat/smooth looking live
server status
feed in a pop-up window. I've seen some stats
That was an excellent description of what's happening under the hood!
I've been trying to get an explanation of this trying to decide whether
to run 1 or 2 CPUs and would it make a difference in running HLDS
because it wasn't written for SMP systems. I guess I have it now.
On a side note, just
hmm, why not http://djeyl.net/w ? ;-)
cheers,
-- djeyl
- Original Message -
From: m0gely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] online stats
Jay Anstiss wrote:
Site: http://www.clan-jpf.com/ - in the menu
Yeah, but learning screen is a very good idea. There's really no
reason to learn about ampersands and all that :)
Well, actually, I use to start my Linux seti processes in the
background,
since they are non-interactive. And, yes, I learned about the
before screen. ;)
Yes, but that's
Correct me if I'm wrong but it is server-side and all it
does is stop the drawing of players who are behind walls,
so wallhacks that see player models through walls no longer
function. Things like seeing people through boxes and doors
may still work because the models are still drawn in those
Mogely said:
I know you said you didn't code well, but if your smart enough to
integrate someone elses work into your page, I would think editing a html
file
would be doable.
With regards to not being a coder I was referring to things like php files.
Yes, I could edit a html easy enough, but
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
I've tested the new VAC WH-Block with OGCglhack 2.5 in my server.
Result: WH-Block don't work with my KYRO 2. I can see the enemy through the
wall.
It's the same result like the earlier VAC-beta phase.
Am I odd?
-
Wait, what does OT mean and why did you post using it?
Uh...OT stands for Off Topic. It's a way for people to distinguish
posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this listserv.
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:27 pm, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Wait, what does OT mean and why did you post using it?
Uh...OT stands for Off Topic. It's a way for people to distinguish
posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this listserv.
This least certainly has no end of OT
And the show has reached a new low!
-Original Message-
Uh...OT stands for Off Topic. It's a way for people to
distinguish
posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this
listserv.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or
Heya.
I've had two of my admins banned by VAC from a DOD server I run. both claim
the only thing they
have installed into halflife is various skins.
So is VAC banning people using skins now? Could we seriously get a list of
what VAC detects and also make it so it logs what someone was using? At
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
According to ur mail,
with the new VAC-WH block, the wall-hack cheaters can still see through box
and door and corner? (image)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
According to ur mail,
with the new VAC-WH block, the wall-hack cheaters can still see through box
and door and corner?
-[ ¹ÞÀº ¸ÞÀÏ ³»¿ë ]--
Title : Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me.
Date : Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:36:57 +1300
From
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:50:26PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
And the show has reached a new low!
-Original Message-
Uh...OT stands for Off Topic. It's a way for people to
distinguish
posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this
listserv.
Why wouldn't we
They are probably cheaters.
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:13 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] new VAC bans for skins?
Heya.
I've had two of my admins banned by VAC from a DOD server I run. both
claim
these guys are long standing admins, i'm 99% sure they are not cheats.
They are probably cheaters.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002
Thats right, no way around this with the HL engine currently to my
knowledge.
- Original Message -
From: seaofp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:31 PM
Subject: [RE]Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me.
[ Converted text/html to
Just to poke a dead horse I wonder who will have the last say
on this thread. I put down my body weight in gold - thats 438
Kg - that is will be Eric the Remix0r.
*poke* You must be a big boy...
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
http://csnation.counter-strike.net/comments.php?id=4890=true[1]
In that article in CSN, the example describes the wall-hacker cannot see
through the door.
It's very odd thing..
:(
-[ ¹ÞÀº ¸ÞÀÏ ³»¿ë ]--
Title : Re: [RE]Re: [hlds_linux] VAC
31 matches
Mail list logo
