The VAC module needs the root dir of your game server to be writeable by the
game server user.
Justin Mitchell wrote:
> Hi. I am setting up my servers to run chroot, and for some reason the
> vac module will not download properly when it's setup this way. Any
> ideas why this might be? Where does
Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted remotely, so
if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What kinds of issues were you
having? Were you using an rpm or source?
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue
vOrTeX said:
> Running multiple HLDS on RedHat with a Pentium P4 CPU (perhaps its a
> linux 2.4 kernel issue, rather than a RedHat issue) had been brought up
> a few times over the past month, it seems that there is a problem that
> causes multiple HLDS processes to use more CPU than they need, and
Well what purpose does it serve? And is it possible that it was
interfering with my Battlefield 1942 gaming?
I'm also getting complaints of increased lag That doesn't
really seem possible...
-
Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend
"Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors."
"Waiting
Hi. I am setting up my servers to run chroot, and for some reason the vac
module will not download properly when it's setup this way. Any ideas why
this might be? Where does the module actually download to? Does it go on the
filesystem somewhere? Does it use any special libraries?
Justin
Howdy,
> Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a lot
> better luck.
I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had more
troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D (heh, i am
looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my network... i ca
Wow... very good to know I was wondering why my freebsd boxes
outperformed redhat by so much.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
> Try the 2.4.9 serie
Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a lot better
luck.
- Original Message -
From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
>
> Howdy,
>
> Running multiple HLDS on RedHat w
Howdy,
Running multiple HLDS on RedHat with a Pentium P4 CPU (perhaps its a
linux 2.4 kernel issue, rather than a RedHat issue) had been brought up
a few times over the past month, it seems that there is a problem that
causes multiple HLDS processes to use more CPU than they need, and lag
the ser
Hi,
I have a very strange problem of cpu use.
If I ran 2 or more HL servers, the cpu is totally used. If only one server
is started, cpu is only use by 20%.
2 serveurs <> 2 * 20% cpu !
I run HL server on a redhat linux distrib (7.2, kernel 2.4.19). The box is a
P4 with 1GB RAM.
Anyone has thi
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:47:15PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
> Ok, that looks to have done it. Now... What's with the movement
> when in spec? I seem to notice this happening again, where you
> float in a diamond while in spectator mode.
You'll get used to it =)
--
James.
Ok, that looks to have done it. Now... What's with the movement
when in spec? I seem to notice this happening again, where you
float in a diamond while in spectator mode.
-
Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend
"Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors."
"Waiting for our enemies to st
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:23:52PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
> The UA forums are useless... full of a bunch of n00bs all asking
> the same question regarding the client. I'm having problems with
> the server... It loads, runs fine for a while, and after about 5
> minutes, boom. Crash. An
The UA forums are useless... full of a bunch of n00bs all asking
the same question regarding the client. I'm having problems with
the server... It loads, runs fine for a while, and after about 5
minutes, boom. Crash. And since we've broken this Cheating Death
thread into about 6 threads, I can't ke
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:46:06PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
> The readme for Cheating-Death says:
>
> "Cheating-Death 2.2 for Linux Servers
> http://www.unitedadmins.com/cdeath/
>
>
> NOTICE:
> ---
> Cheating-Death does not work with MODs that can use Valve's
> anti-cheat (VAC).
> T
if you would have read the list here - this topic was addressed two times
already :)
it does work with CS
the plugin directory is also mentioned wrong in the readme...
c'Ya HEAD
At 15:46 18.02.03 -0500, you wrote:
The readme for Cheating-Death says:
"Cheating-Death 2.2 for Linux Servers
http://
The readme for Cheating-Death says:
"Cheating-Death 2.2 for Linux Servers
http://www.unitedadmins.com/cdeath/
NOTICE:
---
Cheating-Death does not work with MODs that can use Valve's
anti-cheat (VAC).
This means that C-D does not work with Counter-Strike. It does
not matter
if VAC has been t
On Sunday 16 February 2003 23:12, DLinkOZ wrote:
> You misunderstand, it is streaming. This perl script runs at certain times
> (during match times) and simply listens on the configured port and receives
> via the logaddress command.
Hmm... I'll look into that... thanks
--
Insert clever remark h
Domingo wrote:
there is a cs 1.6 server to download?
where can i find cs 1.6?
thanks a lot!
No, the CS 1.6 Beta and server is for windows currently. We get
the final version, then an "a" patch a few days after that cause
they don't let us beta test anything. ;P
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.tele
there is a cs 1.6 server to download?
where can i find cs 1.6?
thanks a lot!
- Original Message -
From: "James Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] [UA] Cheating-Death
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:13:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:13:25PM +1100, Nathan Clark wrote:
> Can I have the link to these forums please?
http://www.0gc.de not really hard to find, you can use Google and you'll
find your way there.
This one I came across yesterday had alot of info on current hacks:
http://www.cheat-network.ne
--On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:35:36 AM -0300 Capriotti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello;
On CS, I can see the following log lines:
L0201123.log:L 02/01/2003 - 23:16:42: [ADMIN] (say) Carol was
banned for
300 min for TKing in first 10 sec.
L0201123.log:L 02/01/2003 - 23:16:42: Ban: "Ca
22 matches
Mail list logo
