RE: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-02-26 Thread Adam Hobbs
Slight decrease in traffic, but all the regulars are still there. I think as word spreads about the All New C-D (tm) numbers will pick up again. Running C-D client side is less hassle than putting up with cheats ruining your fun. I might look into running a mediator if one comes out that doesn't

Re: [hlds_linux] rcon hacking w/out being logged into server?

2003-02-26 Thread Florian Zschocke
Bryan R. Yablonski wrote: Damn, its actually over but I'll reply nevertheless. Let's get serious here why don't we. I wasn't joking. The person asking the original question is looking for a way to stop peeps from attemting to crack their rcon password. If you have any other way to stop a person

RE: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D (off topic)

2003-02-26 Thread Timothy Lynn
Thus spaketh [EMAIL PROTECTED] on : : You're sick of it? I think it rocks! :) It's a great way to : freshen up CS when you just feel like messing around. It's : really interesting, actually, in that it attracts high-level : players that normally don't pub much at the same time as lower : level

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Got one!

2003-02-26 Thread James Clark
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:08:47PM +1030, vOrTeX wrote: > > Hi, > > I see no difference, the log has always looked like this for me :/ > > > Feb 27 14:51:57 games logger: > > L 02/27/2003 - 14:51:57: Secure: "shit<1266><2700541><>" was detected cheating > > and dropped from the server. > > > > Fo

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Got one!

2003-02-26 Thread vOrTeX
Hi, I see no difference, the log has always looked like this for me :/ > Feb 27 14:51:57 games logger: > L 02/27/2003 - 14:51:57: Secure: "shit<1266><2700541><>" was detected cheating and > dropped from the server. > > For all those that want to know what the log line looks like. Cheers, J

Re: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D (off topic)

2003-02-26 Thread Justin Mitchell
lol yeah. I completely ruins my matching skills. I can't go back and forth between the two and be decent. I think I'm done with the mediator plugin too. Works well! I'll release it on amxmod.net after I get a few people to test it :) Justin (aka JustinHoMi aka Skel.MoD :)) - Original Message

RE: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-02-26 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> warcraft3 plugin? Lol Does that amuse you? :) -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

RE: [hlds_linux] Best team-balancing plugin/mod/addon for CS

2003-02-26 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> What's the best team-balancing solution for CS? > The switch the last player to join one is such > a brain-dead approach it might as well not be > turned on Many people are going to suggest PTB, but it's a pain in the ass. It's very intrusive, and it makes very illogical decisions sometimes

RE: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D (off topic)

2003-02-26 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> Yeaaah. I put it on there for a couple days to try it out and > now no one will let me take it off :(. I'm sick of it! > > You can see it here -> http://amxmod.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5620 > Or play it at: 64.5.44.97:27015 You're sick of it? I think it rocks! :) It's a great way to freshen

RE: [good] RE: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-02-26 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> Skel is working on a plugin that allows users to connect in > optional mode until they achieve a definable number of kills > and/or kill/death ratio. If they hit the limit(s), they'll be > booted to the console with a message saying that to continue > playing there, they'll need to install C-D a

Re: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-02-26 Thread PiTaGoRaS
IIRC C-D doesn't detect specific cheats, but blocks them. - PiTaGoRaS - - Original Message - From: "Mike Hodgkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D > C-D detects more cheats than VAC and the deve

RE: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-02-26 Thread Adam Hobbs
My servers all went CD req today after about a week of optional. Servers are pinging better due to the lower load of no VAC. Finally feel like I have a level playing field on my servers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin Mitchell Sent: We

Re: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-02-26 Thread Justin Mitchell
I switched to C-D and am VERY happy :) - Original Message - From: "Mike Hodgkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:45 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D > C-D detects more cheats than VAC and the development team are working on the >

RE: [hlds_linux] rcon hacking w/out being logged into server?

2003-02-26 Thread kama
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > So this is normal? Wow. I'm glad I have rcon disabled. > > You...have rcon disabled?? if the rcon_password is empty you cant utilize rcon commands from clients or using any other udp connection... if i recall correctly One other way is to use a

Re: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-02-26 Thread Mike Hodgkinson
C-D detects more cheats than VAC and the development team are working on the ones that arent. No prizes for guessing what I use. - Original Message - From: "Rouven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:28 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D > T

RE: [hlds_linux] rcon hacking w/out being logged into server?

2003-02-26 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Florian ->Zschocke ->Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:43 AM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] rcon hacking w/out being logged into server? -> -> ->Bryan R. Yablonski wrote: ->> I sug

[hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-02-26 Thread Rouven
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] So, the discussion has to go on ;-) I think it is more difficult for the admins to decide which AC technology they should use on their servers, if VALVe won't publish a list of detected cheats. We can